Re: [ipcdn] Submission: IETF NCS Signaling MIB draft 7 (Update)

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Sumanth Channabasappa" <sumanth at cablelabs.com>
> To: <ipcdn at ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:54 PM
> Subject: [ipcdn] Submission: IETF NCS Signaling MIB draft 7 (Update)
...
> 51) pktcNcsEndPntConfigPartialDialTO:
> "contains maximum" -> "contains the maximum"  (The description and the
> descriptor make it sound like the device may use any timeout value, as
> long as that timeout value is less than this object's value.  Is that
> really the intent? Compare the DESCRIPTIONs of this,
> pktcNcsEndPntConfigBusyToneTO, and pktcNcsEndPntConfigCriticalDialTO.
>
> AI: Added "the". Remainder of comment is unclear.

Here's an example.  If I set this object to 100, and the device times out at
50, that's a conformant implementation, according to this wording.  Is that
really what you want?

Randy



_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
IPCDN at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn