Re: [ipcdn] RE: AD re-review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2-13.txtTopic: docsIfCmtsQosProfilePermissions

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Eduardo Cardona" <e.cardona at CableLabs.com>
> To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen at lucent.com>; <david.raftus at ati.com>
> Cc: "Ipcdn (E-mail)" <ipcdn at ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: AD re-review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2-13.txtTopic: docsIfCmtsQosProfilePermissions
>
> Will update :
>
>           Either createByManagement(0) or updateByManagement(1)
>           MUST be set when writing to this object.
...

Just checking: is the intent of this to prohibit setting both bits?
If it is permissible to set both bits, then this language isn't quite right,
an it might be better to say:
   Attempts to set both createByManagement(0) and updateByManagement(1)
   to zero MUST be rejected.

Randy




_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
IPCDN at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn