[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IPFIX] WG Action: RECHARTER: IP Flow Information Export (ipfix)



Dear all,

As you can see, our new charter is in place.
Thanks to everybody who contributed to proposals for new work items.

I look forward to seeing -00 drafts on
  - anonymization support
  - flow selection 
  - structuring information elements

Thank you,

    Juergen

On 29.09.09 20:30  "IESG Secretary" <iesg-secretary at ietf.org> wrote:

> The IP Flow Information Export (ipfix) working group in the Operations and
> Management Area of the IETF has been rechartered.  For additional
> information, please contact the Area Directors or the working group
> Chairs.
> 
> IP Flow Information Export (ipfix)
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Current Status: Active Working Group
> 
> Chairs:
>   Nevil Brownlee (n.brownlee at auckland.ac.nz)
>   Juergen Quittek (quittek at netlab.nec.de)
> 
> 
> Operations and Management Area Directors:
>   Dan Romascanu (dromasca at avaya.com)
>   Ronald Bonica (rbonica at juniper.net)
> 
> Operations and Management Area Advisor:
>   Dan Romascanu (dromasca at avaya.com)
> 
> Mailing Lists:
>   General Discussion: ipfix at ietf.org
>   To Subscribe: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>   Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix
> 
> Description of Working Group:
> 
> The IPFIX working group has specified the Information Model (to describe
> IP flows) and the IPFIX protocol (to transfer IP flow data from IPFIX
> exporters to collectors). Several implementers have already built
> applications using the IPFIX protocol. As a result of a series of IPFIX
> interoperability testing events the WG has produced guidelines for IPFIX
> implementation and testing as well as recommendations for handling special
> cases such as bidirectional flow reporting and reducing redundancy in flow
> records.
> 
> Practical experiences with IPFIX implementations exposed new requirements
> for the IPFIX protocol that so far have not been addressed by the WG. The
> major current goal of the WG is developing solutions that meet the new
> requirements without modifying the core IPFIX protocol specifications.
> 
> 1. The IPFIX WG has developed a MIB module for monitoring IPFIX
> implementations. Means for configuring these devices have not been
> standardized yet. The WG will develop an XML-based configuration data
> model that can be used for configuring IPFIX devices and for storing,
> modifying and managing IPFIX configurations parameter sets. This work will
> be performed in close collaboration with the NETCONF WG.
> 
> 2. First applications of IPFIX at large operator networks showed the need
> for mediation of flow information, for example, for aggregating huge
> amounts of flow data and for anomymization of flow information. The IPFIX
> WG will investigate this issue and produce a problem statement and a
> framework for IPFIX flow mediation.
> 
> 3. The PSAMP WG has developed a protocol for reporting observed packets.
> The PSAMP protocol is an extension of the IPFIX protocol. The IPFIX WG
> will develop a MIB module for monitoring PSAMP implementations. The new
> MIB module will be an extension of the IPFIX MIB module.
> 
> 4. Anonymization of flow information has been identified as a requirement
> for flow information export already in RFC 3917. However, technologies for
> flow anonymization are still a research issue and have so far not been
> considered to be mature enough for standardization. As one step in this
> direction, the IPFIX WG will develop guidelines for the implementation of
> anonymized data export and storage over IPFIX and define an information
> model for configuring and reporting anonymization applied at IPFIX
> devices.
> 
> 5. The IPFIX and PSAMP WGs have defined standards for selecting observed
> IP packets and collecting information in flow records. In order to reduce
> the amount of data to be processed, packet selection methods have been
> defined. Another method for reducing flow data is flow selection. The
> IPFIX WG will define methods for flow selection and provide an information
> model for configuring and reporting flow selection applied at IPFIX
> devices.
> 
> 6. Being designed for the export of flow records the IPFIX protocol
> provides very limited means for structuring information elements within
> IPFIX records. With the increasing number of IPFIX applications there is a
> need for exporting more complex information. The IPFIX WG will develop an
> extension of the IPFIX protocol that supports hierarchically structured
> data and lists (sequences) of Information Elements in data records.
> 
> Goals and Milestones:
> 
> Oct 2009  Submit Mediation Problem Statement I-D to IESG for
>           publication as Informational RFC
> Oct 2009  Submit initial draft on anonymization support
> Oct 2009  Submit initial draft on flow selection
> Oct 2009  Submit initial draft on structuring information elements
> Jan 2010  Submit Configuration Data Model draft to IESG for publication
>           as Standards track RFC
> Jan 2010  Submit Mediation Framework I-D to IESG for publication as
>           Informational RFC
> Jan 2010  Submit final version of PSAMP MIB module
> Jun 2010  Submit anonymization support I-D to IESG for publication as
>           Experimental RFC
> Jun 2010  Submit flow selection I-D to IESG for publication as
>           Standards Track RFC
> Jun 2010  Submit structuring information elements I-D to IESG for
>           publication as Standards Track RFC

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature