On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Paul Aitken
<paitken at cisco.com> wrote:
Juarez,
This really simplifies things here. Now we're certainly about what we can develop or use on ways to maintain compatibility between IPFIX and NFv9 standards.
Great!
Re: "I know also some differences as [...] some not compatible information elements's id.", which information elements were you thinking of?
We try to keep the NFv9 and IPFIX information elements as unified as possible. There are some NFv9 fields which we chose not to standardise in IPFIX only because they're quite proprietary to cisco and not very useful to anyone else.
--
Paul Aitken
Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.