[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: [RFC 3917]Overload & Reliability requirements of Metering process



Hi Paul,

Certainly, you cannot make a precise estimation how many packets
have been lost.

But as consumer of the exported flow information I would be
highly interested how long a router was restarting. Whether or
noit I can use this information for an estimate depends a lot
on the scenario.

Sujay,

Do you assume that the router is still forwarding packets
while restarting ?

Thanks,

    Juergen


On 21.10.09 20:52  "Paul Aitken" <paitken at cisco.com> wrote:

> sujay,
> 
>> So what I am proposing ( and is possible) is that under these
>> conditions like O/L , soft restart the system (switch/router) can
>> easily send to the collector  at least the "duration under which it
>> was in the O/L/reset condition" . This information I am thinking would
>> be useful as a rough estimate of monitoring lost, canbe converted in
>> to number of packets not accounted for
> 
> No, it can't.
> 
> There are too many variables which the collecting process would have to
> know. eg how many active monitoring processes are there on the exporting
> device, and how much traffic are they each measuring on average?
> 
> The delay between measuring and exporting, and the flow lifetime on the
> switch will also be relevant, since you'll export some partially filled
> flows for some period of time after the reset.
> 
> 
>> or may be used as an unaccounted period by the collector.
> 
> I think that's the only possibility. Let's not try to guess how much
> traffic was lost.
> 
> Cheers,
> P.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature