Re: [IPFIX] WG last call on draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement-06

[sujay gupta <sujay.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi,
A few comments.
1) I have a slight problem overall with the language structuring
especially from section 1 to 4. It could be made simple.
2) IPFIX mediation as a service or device? is intermixed, can we
differentiate that? also can we call the different type of mediators
as services?
3) Is there any line of thought of having the mediation device
incorporate record compression to reduce b/w?(
draft-muenz-ipfix-compression) as another service, or deal with
compressed data from the original exporter?
BR,
-Sujay


On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Juergen Quittek <Quittek at nw.neclab.eu> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> At our session in Stockholm we agreed to start the 2nd working group
> last call on the mediation problem state as soon as a new version
> of it would be available. The new version is
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-state
> ment-06.txt
>
> The call starts today and will last until Friday October 30.
>
> Please read the draft!
> Please send your comments to this mailing list!
> Please also send a message if you are fine with the draft as it is!
>
> Thank you,
>
>    Juergen
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>
>