Re: [IPFIX] WG last call on draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement-06

[sujay gupta <sujay.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi,

I am overall fine with the doc.

small changes however would help such as;
section 4.1, last para mentions the need of system not relying on
data reduction techniques, section 4.4 contradicts it.

section 1, first para, between first and second line could mention
that "traffic monitoring is taxing on the resources" and hence the need
for optimization( ie the 2nd line).
last line in the para says "platform", is it required?

perhaps having a figure showing the position of ipfix-med amongst
other layers( section 2)
would be a nice addition.

BR,
-Sujay


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Juergen Quittek <Quittek at nw.neclab.eu> wrote:
> Hi Sujay,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On 31.10.09 08:27  "sujay gupta" <sujay.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> A few comments.
>> 1) I have a slight problem overall with the language structuring
>> especially from section 1 to 4. It could be made simple.
>
> Would you have concrete suggestions? This would be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Juergen
>
>
>> 2) IPFIX mediation as a service or device? is intermixed, can we
>> differentiate that? also can we call the different type of mediators
>> as services?
>> 3) Is there any line of thought of having the mediation device
>> incorporate record compression to reduce b/w?(
>> draft-muenz-ipfix-compression) as another service, or deal with
>> compressed data from the original exporter?
>> BR,
>> -Sujay
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Juergen Quittek <Quittek at nw.neclab.eu>
>> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> At our session in Stockholm we agreed to start the 2nd working group
>>> last call on the mediation problem state as soon as a new version
>>> of it would be available. The new version is
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-state
>>> ment-06.txt
>>>
>>> The call starts today and will last until Friday October 30.
>>>
>>> Please read the draft!
>>> Please send your comments to this mailing list!
>>> Please also send a message if you are fine with the draft as it is!
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>>    Juergen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPFIX mailing list
>>> IPFIX at ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>>>
>>>
>