Re: [ippm] AD review: draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-03

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at nokia.com>]

Hi,

> On 2007-8-28, at 23:15, ext ippm-bounces at ietf.org wrote:
> > 	Filename	: draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-04.txt

I have re-reviewed the -04 version and am much happier with it.  
Modulo the two small issues below, I think this is ready to ship.

(This was my AD review, which typically happens after pub-requesting,  
so as soon as this gets to me, it'll go to IETF LC.)

Lars


Section 5.2., paragraph 0:
> 5.2.  Information Elements

  Does it make sense to have default values for the information  
elements
  at all? I mean, the data captured by the information model is the
  result of a particular traceroute measurement, which will have been
  taken with a fully specified set of parameters. So the defaults will
  never be actually used, no?


Section 3., paragraph 3:
>    in the path).  Upon receiving a probe, the first hop host  
decreases
>    the TTL value by one.

  Nit: Routers can decrease the TTL by more than one.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm at ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm