Authors,
I haven't seen any reply to these comments yet.
Lars
On 2007-8-28, at 23:15, ext ippm-bounces at ietf.org wrote:Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-04.txt
I have re-reviewed the -04 version and am much happier with it. Modulo the two small issues below, I think this is ready to ship.
(This was my AD review, which typically happens after pub- requesting, so as soon as this gets to me, it'll go to IETF LC.)
Lars
Section 5.2., paragraph 0: > 5.2. Information Elements
Does it make sense to have default values for the information elements
at all? I mean, the data captured by the information model is the
result of a particular traceroute measurement, which will have been
taken with a fully specified set of parameters. So the defaults will
never be actually used, no?
Section 3., paragraph 3:
> in the path). Upon receiving a probe, the first hop host decreases
> the TTL value by one.
Nit: Routers can decrease the TTL by more than one.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm