|
Hi Henk, I have several comments. Scope: The doc makes a lot of comparison
with application behaviors. So, does it make sense to highlight that the doc
does not cover the measure of retransmission of packets at the transport level
or upper? Definition of packet arrival
count: The example (with
the TTL) should not be in the definition section. Fields
of the header which do not change with the path must/may
be part of the identification of a packet. Methodoly: The methodology (section 2.6) of the draft refers to section 2.6 of RFC2680
which speaks about sync of clocks: Is the sync of clocks really
needed for detecting packet duplication? Can the timeout correspond to the inter arrival time between the first
packet received and the first duplicated packet received? Or is it mandatory to compute the diff of the owd? Relation with ITU/T Y.1540: Are Type-P-one-way-packet-duplication-fraction
and IP packet duplicate ratio (IPDR) equal? Are
Type-P-one-way-replicated-packet-rate and replicated IP packet ratio (RIPR)
equal? Is there also an
equivalent to the singletons definition? Editorial: Add " count"
to section 2 title. I found a duplication of ',' in
§2 of section 3.4 :-) regards Emile |
_______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm