[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ippm] [Fwd: IPPM expert review request]
- To: Rschrage <rschrage at schrageconsult.net>, zhangguoying at mail.ritt.com.cn
- Subject: Re: [ippm] [Fwd: IPPM expert review request]
- From: Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:40:52 -0400
- Cc: ccamp at ietf.org, sunwq at mit.edu, 'Henk Uijterwaal' <henk at ripe.net>, "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS'" <dbrungard at att.com>, 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm at ietf.org>
- Delivered-to: ippm at core3.amsl.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=labn.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Z2551FsB2I4U2csvanpEkY/rJHT3pEgqzv0kR28T8pyjK97K59wglmuBiCgnboVjMTwwR8G6elUa4HtM9QkWYOiWk+3sHqB0xIz7S9V4X2dCrs3Dk3eijCAk7tBiO96L;
- In-reply-to: <006001ca1ffe$b55d3820$2017a860$ at net>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
- List-help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <4A6C1B70.6040503 at ripe.net> <4A6ED756.3070609 at ripe.net> <4A6EF5F6.6040201 at labn.net> <006001ca1ffe$b55d3820$2017a860$ at net>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090408 Eudora/3.0b2
Reinhard,
Thank you very much for the comments.
draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm Authors,
Please address the comments/discussion points raised.
Lou
On 8/18/2009 8:23 AM, Rschrage wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry for late response-
>
> Nevertheless here is a first edition of my revision of doc
> draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-06.
>
> The doc has been saved in Word 2003 format to easily track changes.
> I am using Kaspersky Anti Virus 2010 software so I trust there should be no
> unpleasant surprises when downloading the attached word doc.
>
>
> I thought it would be advisable to first address the suggested comments and
> questions upto and including the uni-directional LSP setup delay metric and
> after that to continue with the bi-directional and sample definitions as
> covered in the doc.
>
> Please let me have your thoughts on this.
>
> Many thanks.
> Reinhard Schrage
> Tel: +49 (0) 5137 909540
> Mobile: +49 (0) 172 26.36.046
> reinhard at schrageconsult.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou
> Berger
> Sent: Dienstag, 28. Juli 2009 14:59
> To: Henk Uijterwaal
> Cc: zhangguoying at mail.ritt.com.cn; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS;
> sunwq at mit.edu; IETF IPPM WG
> Subject: Re: [ippm] [Fwd: IPPM expert review request]
>
> Hank/Reinhard,
>
> Thank you very much for undertaking this review. Please cc
> ccamp at ietf.org on any comments you may have.
>
> Lou
>
> On 7/28/2009 6:47 AM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
>> Lou, others,
>>
>>> We received the request for a review of a document currently under
>>> discussion in the CCAMP WG, please see below. Is there anybody who
>>> has time to do this review in the near future?
>> Reinhard Schrage (rschrage at schrageconsult.net) has voluntered to do this.
>>
>> Reinhard: please post anything you find to both the list and the authors.
>> And thank you for doing this.
>>
>> Henk
>>
>>> Matt & Henk
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: IPPM expert review request
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:57:41 -0400
>>> From: Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net>
>>> To: ippm-chairs at tools.ietf.org
>>> CC: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS <dbrungard at att.com>, sunwq at mit.edu,
>>> zhangguoying <zhangguoying at mail.ritt.com.cn>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> We, the CCAMP WG chairs, would like to request that the IPPM WG
>>> review
>>> a draft that is progressing through the CCAMP WG. This work applies
>>> IPPM approaches to GMPLS. The document we'd like reviewed is
>>> available at:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-06
>>>
>>> Is this acceptable? Can you undertake this review? Alternatively, we
>>> can just last call the document in your WG (it has already passed CCAMP
>>> WG LC).
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Lou (and Deborah)
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm