[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ippm] Testing TCP Throughput Capacity in Operator Networks
My thoughts are similar to Henk's. IPPM has always been interested in
the area (see the bulk transport capacity work), so I'd claim the area
is in-scope, but doing work would require AD discussion.
I think Matt Mathis' last message to the list is also worth thought;
it's hard to create a good metric. In some sense what has been proposed
is documenting current practice (we do something similar for quality
control on the R&E networks, and NPAD is used for debugging).
I cannot be in Hiroshima do to a conflicting conference, but look
forward to the results of any discussion there.
--Matt
On 10/13/09 6:17 AM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
> Hi Ruediger,
>
> Personal opinion, not discussed with Matt or AD's yet
>
>> I'm not sure, whether IPPM is chartered to specify transport layer
>> performance metrics. I've checked the PMOL charter and it clearly says
>> PMOL works above transport layer. A fair conclusion would be, that
>> IPPM is chartered to investigate transport layer performance.
>
> I looked at it from a slightly different angle. Network capacity has
> always been a topic of interest for IPPM, so this work would be in our
> charter. PMOL deals with higher layers, besides that (AFAIK) the PMOL
> WG is in some form of hybernation.
>
> So, my take on this is that we should see if there is interest to work
> on this topic _and_ have a first version of a draft, we can decide later
> where exactly this works fits in the IETF.
>
> Henk
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Henk Uijterwaal Email:
> henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
> RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
> P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414
> 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445
> The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Belgium: an unsolvable problem, discussed in endless meetings, with no
> hope for a solution, where everybody still lives happily.
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm