Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi, On 2009-10-13, at 23:32, Matthew J Zekauskas wrote:My thoughts are similar to Henk's. IPPM has always been interested in the area (see the bulk transport capacity work), so I'd claim the area is in-scope, but doing work would require AD discussion.I think it wouldn't be unreasonable for IPPM to take this on, if we more clearly nail down what "this" is.
In order to move forward: I suggest that Barry writes a -00 draft (including
a definition of "this") before Hiroshima. 3-4 people showing interest should
be sufficient to review it. In Hiroshima, we can discuss the draft further,
afterwards we can decide on the mailing list and with the AD to pick it up
as a WG item or not.
Barry, can you produce something before Hiroshima?
Henk
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Belgium: an unsolvable problem, discussed in endless meetings, with no
hope for a solution, where everybody still lives happily.