IPR-WG Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Jun 04 2006

Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey

Jun 03 2006

#1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Harald Alvestrand
Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), Harald Alvestrand

May 31 2006

Re: Status of IETF Policies and Rules, todd glassey
Re: Status of IETF Policies and Rules, todd glassey
Status of IETF Policies and Rules, Contreras, Jorge

May 29 2006

Re: #1175 Code vs text, todd glassey
Re: #1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., todd glassey
Question about Tax Liabilities and the IETF's document portfolio and its worth..., todd glassey
Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1175 Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., todd glassey

May 28 2006

Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bill Fenner

May 27 2006

Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Re: #1175 Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Lawrence Rosen

May 26 2006

Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey

May 25 2006

Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Ted Hardie
RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Lawrence Rosen
RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Black_David
RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, David B Harrington
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
Re: Question for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process."what if the IP value > $500 USD?", todd glassey
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
Proposal to add a Set of Outgoing Use Statements, todd glassey
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, bmanning
Re: #1166 Quotations - debate summary, John C Klensin
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Harald Alvestrand
RE: Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process."what if the IP value > $500 USD?", Contreras, Jorge
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1175 Code vs text, John C Klensin
PROPOSED NEW ISSUE... In Submitting a Document there are TWO pieces of IP being considered for Publication., todd glassey
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
#1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
#1167 Excerpt labelling - resolution, summary of discussion, Harald Alvestrand
#1166 Quotations - debate summary, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Harald Alvestrand
#1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Harald Alvestrand
Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process." what if the IP value > $500 USD?", todd glassey

May 24 2006

Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
RE: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Contreras, Jorge
Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
Re: do not feed the trolls, Fred Baker
Re: do not feed the trolls, todd glassey
do not feed the trolls, Steven M. Bellovin

May 23 2006

Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson

May 22 2006

RE: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, David B Harrington
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand

May 20 2006

Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Scott W Brim
Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Question about copyright text..., Harald Alvestrand
Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey

May 19 2006

Question about copyright text..., todd glassey

May 10 2006

Re: What if...hypothetical, todd glassey

May 09 2006

Re: What if...hypothetical, Joel M. Halpern
Re: What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), Harald Alvestrand

May 02 2006

Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Tom Petch
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Ted Hardie
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: A simpler idea, Simon Josefsson
Re: A simpler idea, Simon Josefsson

Apr 30 2006

Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Spencer Dawkins

Apr 29 2006

RE: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), Contreras, Jorge
RE: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Contreras, Jorge
RE: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Contreras, Jorge

Apr 28 2006

RE: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), David B Harrington
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), todd glassey
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Ted Hardie
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), todd glassey
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Don Armstrong
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Ted Hardie
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Tom Petch
Re: Fair use and case analysis, John C Klensin
A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Simon Josefsson
Re: Fair use and case analysis, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 27 2006

No Excerpt Rights are needed... Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
Stanford University's Fair Use Copyright Site..., todd glassey
Re: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), todd glassey
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), John C Klensin
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
Re: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", bmanning
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Fw: [Politech] Redlined version of Bush administration's proposal to expand DMCA [ip], Harald Alvestrand
#1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 26 2006

Question about how IPR Rights will be recorded., todd glassey
Fw: [Politech] Redlined version of Bush administration's proposal to expand DMCA [ip], todd glassey

Apr 25 2006

Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, John C Klensin
Re: #1169 Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1169 Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Simon Josefsson
#1169 Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Ted Hardie
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Harald Alvestrand
#1166 and derived works? (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Spencer Dawkins
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, todd glassey
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Spencer Dawkins
#1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
#1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 20 2006

Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 19 2006

Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, todd glassey
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Don Armstrong
RE: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Contreras, Jorge
Re: Comments on minutes, todd glassey
Re: Comments on minutes, Simon Josefsson

Apr 18 2006

Re: Comments on minutes, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Comments on minutes, Scott Bradner
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Tom Petch
Comments on minutes, Simon Josefsson
Minutes uploaded, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Simon Josefsson
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 17 2006

Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Simon Josefsson

Apr 13 2006

FW: [CNI-(C)] Re: IETF/source code copyright status, Lawrence Rosen

Apr 11 2006

RE: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Lawrence Rosen
Draft minutes, IPR WG, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Don Armstrong

Apr 10 2006

Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, John L
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 09 2006

Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, John Levine
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Don Armstrong

Apr 08 2006

Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, bmanning
RE: Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, John Calhoon \(LCA\)
Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs, Lawrence Rosen

Apr 07 2006

Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 06 2006

Apr 05 2006

Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Ted Hardie
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Harald Alvestrand

Apr 04 2006

Re: Resolution of #1245 - Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, todd glassey
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification fromIPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, todd glassey
RE: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Simon Josefsson
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Thomas Narten
RE: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, David B Harrington
Re: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Spencer Dawkins
RE: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Black_David
Resolution of #1245 - Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, Harald Alvestrand
Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures, Harald Alvestrand

Mar 25 2006

SOFTEWARE PATENT Insttiute... Emailing: www.spi.org, todd glassey

Mar 25 2006

Re: A note about copyright notices, todd glassey
Re: A note about copyright notices, todd glassey
Re: A note about copyright notices, Simon Josefsson
Re: Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, todd glassey

Mar 24 2006

Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, Harald Alvestrand
A note about copyright notices, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, todd glassey
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, Simon Josefsson
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, todd glassey
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, Simon Josefsson
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Harald Alvestrand

Mar 23 2006

Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, todd glassey
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, stewe
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Harald Alvestrand
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, todd glassey
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, todd glassey
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, Simon Josefsson
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Brian E Carpenter
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, todd glassey
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Harald Alvestrand
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Sam Hartman
Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Harald Alvestrand

Mar 22 2006

Re: IPR disclosures for individual submissions, todd glassey
IPR disclosures for individual submissions, Sam Hartman
Re: the (ir?)relevance of syslogRe: #1245: Does describing a technologyrequire a license from thepeople who originally described it?, todd glassey

Mar 21 2006

the (ir?)relevance of syslogRe: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license from thepeople who originally described it?, Tom Petch
Re: Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, todd glassey
Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license fromthepeople who originally described it?, todd glassey

Mar 20 2006

RE: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license fromthepeople who originally described it?, Lawrence Rosen
Re: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license from thepeople who originally described it?, todd glassey
Re: Audio Info], George T. Willingmyre
Re: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, Tom Petch
[Fwd: Audio Info], Harald Alvestrand

Mar 19 2006

Re: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, todd glassey
Re: Updated agenda, IPR wg, todd glassey
Re: #1245: Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, todd glassey
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Updated agenda, IPR wg, Simon Josefsson
Re: Updated agenda, IPR wg, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Updated agenda, IPR wg, Simon Josefsson
Re: Todd Glassey's issues list, Harald Alvestrand
#1245: Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: ISSUE - Submission Release Failures... - The Syslog Example., todd glassey
Re: Todd Glassey's issues list, todd glassey
Todd Glassey's issues list, Harald Alvestrand
Updated agenda, IPR wg, Harald Alvestrand
Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: ISSUE - Submission Release Failures... - The Syslog Example., Harald Alvestrand
Jorge - I see a federal judge today stopped the Nortious BIG's album today..., todd glassey

Mar 17 2006

Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, todd glassey

Mar 17 2006

Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Spencer Dawkins
Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?, todd . glassey
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, todd . glassey
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Brian E Carpenter
Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?, todd glassey

Mar 15 2006

resend - this did not seem to make it the 1st time, Scott Bradner
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Pekka Savola
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, todd glassey
ISSUE - Submission Release Failures... - The Syslog Example., todd glassey
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Scott Bradner
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Brian E Carpenter

Mar 14 2006

Re: Tentative agenda, IPR WG session in Dallas, Simon Josefsson
Issues - Managing BCP's & Issues with Expiring BCP's when they fail to continue to be the 'BCP', todd glassey
Re: Tentative agenda, IPR WG session in Dallas, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Tentative agenda, IPR WG session in Dallas, Simon Josefsson
Re: Review of draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-04.txt, Scott Bradner
Review of draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-04.txt, Simon Josefsson
Re: Review of draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Review of draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt, Simon Josefsson
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Thomas Narten
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Scott Bradner
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Thomas Narten
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, todd glassey
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Scott W Brim
Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Scott Bradner

Mar 13 2006

3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979, Thomas Narten
ISSUES -3 new additions for the ISSUES list., todd glassey
Fw: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., todd glassey
Re: NOTE-WELL Participation..., John C Klensin

Mar 12 2006

Re: NOTE-WELL Participation..., todd glassey
Re: NOTE-WELL Participation..., Harald Alvestrand
Re: NOTE-WELL Participation..., John C Klensin
RE: Does under Title 35, a submission to the IETF constitute an invention?, Contreras, Jorge
Tentative agenda, IPR WG session in Dallas, Harald Alvestrand
Re: NOTE-WELL Participation..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
TYPO Correction - Re: A real-world example of the IETF's screwed up induction processor "Who owns Syslog?" - and why is this important to IPR?, todd glassey
NOTE-WELL Participation..., todd glassey
Re: A real-world example of the IETF's screwed up induction process or "Who owns Syslog?" - and why is this important to IPR?, todd glassey
Does under Title 35, a submission to the IETF constitute an invention?, todd glassey
Re: A real-world example of the IETF's screwed up induction process or "Who owns Syslog?" - and why is this important to IPR?, Harald Alvestrand

Mar 11 2006

Mar 10 2006

Re: Date clarification [Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?], Brian E Carpenter
Jorge as the IETF's lawyer, does the merging of the two sets of rights defined in the BCP78 document make an exclusive?, todd glassey

Mar 09 2006

RE: Date clarification [Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?], John C Klensin
Re: exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions., todd glassey

Mar 08 2006

Re: exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions., Steven M. Bellovin
exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions., todd glassey
Re: BCP78's Copyright Statement... may be wrong - all submissions to the IETF are likely exclusive in nature. They have to be!, todd glassey
BCP78's Copyright Statement... may be wrong - all submissions to the IETF are likely exclusive in nature. They have to be!, todd glassey
Where's the Contract - Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: proposed new charter, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Date clarification [Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?], Contreras, Jorge
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-04.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Simon Josefsson
Re: If there is no exclusive conveyance agreement then who owns thedelta between when an idea was submitted as a ID and when itbecones a RFC?, todd glassey
WG Action: RECHARTER: Intellectual Property Rights (ipr), IESG Secretary

Mar 07 2006

If there is no exclusive conveyance agreement then who owns the delta between when an idea was submitted as a ID and when it becones a RFC?, todd glassey
Here is a PDF timeline showing the 5 states of ownership of the IETF's works..., todd glassey
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: proposed new charter, Bill Fenner
Date clarification [Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?], Brian E Carpenter
Re: proposed new charter, Brian E Carpenter
RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Contreras, Jorge
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Simon Josefsson
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Simon Josefsson
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Contreras, Jorge
RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Contreras, Jorge

Mar 06 2006

Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Frank Ellermann
Re: proposed new charter, Fred Baker
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Bill Fenner
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: proposed new charter, Bill Fenner
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: proposed new charter, Harald Alvestrand
Re: proposed new charter, Brian E Carpenter
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Joel M. Halpern
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Joel M. Halpern
Re: proposed new charter, Allison Mankin
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, John C Klensin
Re: #1212 Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
Re: proposed new charter, Brian E Carpenter
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Harald Alvestrand
#1212 Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: proposed new charter, Bill Fenner
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, todd glassey
RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Joel M. Halpern
RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, John C Klensin

Mar 05 2006

RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Contreras, Jorge
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Joel M. Halpern
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Simon Josefsson
Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Steven M. Bellovin
ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?, Simon Josefsson
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt, Internet-Drafts

Mar 02 2006

Re: ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution -Implementationandderivativework, Harald Alvestrand
Re: ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution -Implementationandderivativework, todd glassey
Re: ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementationandderivativework, Steven M. Bellovin

Mar 02 2006

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementationandderivativework, todd glassey
Rule 107 and the US Copyright Code..., todd glassey
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementationandderivativework, todd glassey
ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation andderivativework, Harald Alvestrand
RE: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation andderivativework, Contreras, Jorge
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation andderivative work, todd glassey
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Simon Josefsson

Mar 01 2006

Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, todd glassey
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Simon Josefsson
proposed new charter, Steven M. Bellovin
NOTEWELL IS BROKEN - was Re: Rights in mailing list articles Re: #1197, todd glassey
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, todd glassey
Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Brian E Carpenter
CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Harald Alvestrand

Feb 25 2006

Editor for "outgoing rights" document, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Feb 23 2006

RE: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, David B Harrington
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Simon Josefsson

Feb 22 2006

Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Ted Hardie
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Don Armstrong
Another proposed #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, todd glassey
Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
WG Review: Recharter of Intellectual Property Rights (ipr), IESG Secretary
Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), todd glassey
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Simon Josefsson
Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Feb 20 2006

Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., todd glassey
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP isinput and Intent...), todd glassey
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Simon Josefsson
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Simon Josefsson

Feb 17 2006

Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Frank Ellermann
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., todd glassey
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), todd glassey
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Simon Josefsson
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Brian E Carpenter
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Frank Ellermann

Feb 16 2006

Fw: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), todd glassey
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., todd glassey
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), todd glassey
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Simon Josefsson
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Simon Josefsson
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Simon Josefsson
Re: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Simon Josefsson
#1199 Re: ISSUE: outbound license on future RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Feb 10 2006

ISSUE: outbound license on future RFCs, Simon Josefsson
ISSUES How IP is input and Intent..., todd glassey
Reminder: Open issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Feb 08 2006

Re: Flawed license in document..., todd glassey
Re: Flawed license in document..., Simon Josefsson
Re: Flawed license in document..., Ted Hardie
Re: Flawed license in document..., Simon Josefsson

Feb 06 2006

Re: Flawed license in document..., Ted Hardie
Re: Flawed license in document..., Frank Ellermann
Re: Flawed license in document..., Don Armstrong
Re: Flawed license in document..., Ted Hardie
Flawed license in document..., Simon Josefsson

Feb 02 2006

My apologies - there is a PDF file attached to this - 27KB - its a license worth looking at., todd glassey
RE: License for the Service Data Objects JavaDoc and Interface Definition files, Lawrence Rosen
Fw: DoC Report on New Internet Protocol, George T. Willingmyre

Feb 01 2006

Re: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, Simon Josefsson
Fw: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, todd glassey

Jan 31 2006

Re: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Jan 27 2006

Re: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, todd glassey
RE: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, Lawrence Rosen
Re: How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, Don Armstrong
Re: One copyright issue or Two?, todd glassey
How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?, todd glassey

Jan 26 2006

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: One copyright issue or Two?, Simon Josefsson
Re: One copyright issue or Two?, todd glassey
Re: One copyright issue or Two?, Simon Josefsson
Re: One copyright issue or Two?, Brian E Carpenter
Proposed updated charter, IPR WG, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1175 Re: Code vs text, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Jan 24 2006

Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., todd glassey
RE: Code vs text, Lawrence Rosen
RE: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Kieran Power
RE: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Contreras, Jorge

Jan 24 2006

Re: Code vs text, todd . glassey
Re: Code vs text, John C Klensin
Re: Code vs text, todd . glassey
Re: Code vs text, John C Klensin
Re: Code vs text, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: Code vs text, Brian E Carpenter

Jan 23 2006

Re: Code vs text, John C Klensin
Re: Code vs text, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Code vs text, Brian E Carpenter

Jan 22 2006

Re: Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Steven M. Bellovin
RE: Code vs text, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Code vs text, todd glassey
Re: Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Frank Ellermann

Jan 21 2006

RE: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Christian Huitema
Re: Code vs text, John C Klensin
Re: Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Frank Ellermann
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, todd glassey
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Frank Ellermann
Code vs text (was: Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg), Spencer Dawkins
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, todd glassey
Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg, Simon Josefsson
issue tracker created for IPR wg, Steven M. Bellovin

Jan 19 2006

RE: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., todd . glassey
RE: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Lawrence Rosen
Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Simon Josefsson
RE: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Lawrence Rosen

Jan 18 2006

Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., todd . glassey
Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Joel M. Halpern
Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., todd . glassey
Re: The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Status summary, IPR WG - Jan 17, 2005, Contreras, Jorge
draft of GPLv3 release, Steven M. Bellovin

Jan 17 2006

The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims..., todd glassey
OFFLIST Re: FYI - Legal Definition of a Derivative Work - per Copyright, todd glassey
Re: FYI - Legal Definition of a Derivative Work - per Copyright, todd glassey
Re: Status summary, IPR WG - Jan 17, 2005, Frank Ellermann
RE: FYI - Legal Definition of a Derivative Work - per Copyright, Contreras, Jorge

Mail converted by MHonArc