[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: clarification of blanket statement text

To: "'Powers Chuck-RXCP20'" <Chuck.Powers at motorola.com>, "'Contreras, Jorge'" <Jorge.Contreras at wilmerhale.com>, "'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'" <harald at alvestrand.no>, "'George T. Willingmyre'" <gtw at gtwassociates.com>, "'Scott W Brim'" <sbrim at cisco.com>, <ipr-wg at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: clarification of blanket statement text
From: "Robert Barr " <rbarr at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:30:29 -0800
In-reply-to: <C81125A8DFFDB44683F2A87AB17FCD02082DED@il06exm62.ds.mot.com>
List-help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: rbarr at cisco.com
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcUYTQ+AqAanKa1iRqqH9vJCnZg85gAALyIgAADZWZA=

> However, those statement are still in effect for any work and/or
> contributions which preceeded the official adoption of RFC 3668, and
> this, too, should be made clear. 

I think we should leave that to the courts to decide, IMO 2026 is unclear on
the effect of such statements. 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

References:
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text
  - From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20

Prev by Date: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: clarification of blanket statement text
Next by thread: Re: clarification of blanket statement text
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread