Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com>]

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 15:40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I think there are certainly strong arguments for permitting the IETF to
> incorporate derived works into future standards, but I'm not that
> convinced by the need to notify the IETF - the vast majority of
> derivations are unlikely to be interesting, and the effort required to
> process notifications may be large. 

Given how many internet drafts are handled by the IETF, I suspect the IETF will cope.  (I don't actually think any new mechanism is required -- the i-d
submission mechanism will do).

> Regardless, I'd view this situation as a significant improvement over 
> the current one.

I don't think it's all that different from the current situation.

						- Bill




_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg