--On 6. november 2005 06:39 +0100 Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com> wrote:
I agree with John here. Giving up the ownership of I-Ds and RFCs (and trademarks, domain names, mailing lists, ...) to an organization without a binding agreement that it will do as the IETF community wishes seem frivolous.
I don't think this is a problem.
Remember that the trustees of the IETF trust are defined as the IAOC. And the IAOC is defined in BCP 101, which says among other things:
3. Structure of the IASA
The IASA structure is designed to ensure accountability and transparency of the IETF administrative and fiscal activities to the IETF community. The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) directs and oversees the IASA. The IAOC consists of volunteers, all chosen directly or indirectly by the IETF community, as well as appropriate ex officio members from ISOC and IETF leadership. The IAOC shall be accountable to the IETF community for the effectiveness, efficiency, and transparency of the IASA.
.....
3.2. IAOC Responsibilities
The IAOC's role is to provide appropriate direction to the IAD, to review the IAD's regular reports, and to oversee IASA functions to ensure that the administrative needs of the IETF community are being properly met.
Attachment:
pgpSoTjh4aeCX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg