RE: "Field of Use" approach to allowing RFC text modifications

[Black_David at emc.com]

Simon

> Without seeing a specific license text proposal, I can't agree.  There
> are many subtleties in crafting such license text, and it may turn out
> that some aspect of my examples would not be permitted with your
> license text.

That's fine; if the situation were reversed, I'd have the same reservation.
Having stumbled into this less than a week prior to the IETF meeting,
attempting to get the final text done by the IPR WG meeting tomorrow
would be a "haste makes waste" exercise.

I would hope to see a discussion tomorrow about the approach to take
and what the properties of the final text should be.  If "field of
use" is the outcome, Jorge and I probably "win" an action item to
draft the actual text as input to the WG.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david at emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg