Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07

[Ted Hardie <hardie at qualcomm.com>]

B.

I agree with everything Bill said below.
			
			Ted

At 10:10 AM -0400 8/11/06, Bill Fenner wrote:
>>B - Go forward with draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-00
>
>The trust update is too important to tie it up with bits that are
>controversial.  While the authors of draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07
>made a valiant effort to make it non-controversial, they apparently
>still failed.  Let the trust update go through and keep working
>towards consensus on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update.
>
> Bill
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ipr-wg mailing list
>Ipr-wg at ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg