[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for publication of draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01 as a BCP

I will move this along quickly, but I think it will be smoother if
Scott can make a quick update for that substantive change and the nits.

    Brian

Harald Alvestrand wrote: 
Area Director of the General Area,

the WG chairs of the IPR WG hereby requests publication of draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01 as a BCP document, with the additional processing required for a procedural update.

The following issues are known:

- Section 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 and 2.9 change "ISOC and the IETF" (or equivalent) to "IETF Trust". These should be
changed to "IETF Trust and the IETF".

- There are a couple of nits outstanding:

idnits 1.106
tmp/draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01.txt:


 Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
 * The document seems to lack a Security Considerations section.
 * The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section.
      Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...

* The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.5 Disclaimer -- however,
there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?

 Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
   Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of
   1id-guidelines.txt yet).

 Miscellaneous warnings:
   None.

 Experimental warnings:
 - Missing Reference: 'RFC3978' is mentioned on line 56, but not defined
 - Missing Reference: 'BCP101' is mentioned on line 64, but not defined
 - Unused Reference: 'RFC 3978' is defined on line 134, but not referenced
 - Unused Reference: 'BCP 101' is defined on line 137, but not referenced



Please inform the WG if you wish these to be resolved with a new I-D before Last Call.

                       Harald Alvestrand, for the IPR WG chairs.






_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg