The remaining nits, as far as I can see, are:
2.1: "Section 1" should be "Section 2" (typo).
2.1: One "IETF" is dropped. This isn't in the actual license, so it less important from a legal perspective. It is still incorrect though, and may give lay-readers an incorrect view.
In other words, I can't find any serious problems with -02. Thanks!
I will start the IETF Last Call. We can fix these nits later in the process.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg