[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Appeals [Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-02.txt]
On 2007-01-25 08:37, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> writes:
[URLs can be moving trgets and don't necessarily]
preserve the appeal paths.
The document could state that they should preserve it.
I don't see how. The current appeal path is conflated with documents,
a IETF last call and an IESG evaluation. I'm not sure the current
appeal paths would apply to changes in legal text crafted by the IASA
and only published on their web pages.
BCP 101 establishes an appeal path for IAOC decisions. Since Trustees
equals IAOC, we're covered.
There are no requirements to have notification of changes in the legal
text sent to, e.g., the ietf-announce mailing list.
No, but failure to do so would breach the BCP 101 requirement for
openness, so would seem to be appealable. I don't think we need
microlegislation.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg