On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:20 +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-01-25 08:37, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> writes:
[URLs can be moving trgets and don't necessarily]
preserve the appeal paths.
The document could state that they should preserve it.
I don't see how. The current appeal path is conflated with documents,
a IETF last call and an IESG evaluation. I'm not sure the current
appeal paths would apply to changes in legal text crafted by the IASA
and only published on their web pages.
BCP 101 establishes an appeal path for IAOC decisions. Since Trustees
equals IAOC, we're covered.
None of the appeal paths described in BCP 101 appear to have any powers
over legal contract matters. Which, when I read it, seems to include
everything we are discussing here.
In no circumstances may the IAB or
ISOC Board of Trustees overturn a decision of the IAOC that involves
a binding contract ...
As far as I can tell, the only body that can review the IAOC's behaviour
related to contract matters is the IAOC itself.