Patent policy and this mailing list (Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG)

[Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

Thierry Moreau wrote:
> P.S. Since even RFC3979 itself is absent from the IETF ipr wg charter; 
> perhaps the above is totally off-topic.
Actually getting the WG to do something to change what RFC 3979 says 
would require a change to the WG's charter.

I believe arguing for such a charter change is within scope for the 
mailing list, but only if new information has come to light since the 
last time the issue was raised; it would take a *very* strong argument 
to convince me, at least, to take on such a task before the WG is 
finished with its current tasks.

Harald


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg