Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document]

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

Thanks for alerting me to Jon Peterson's document.

I'll try to get it read ASAP, and will try to tone my reaction down by 
about 7 orders of magnitude from my initial reaction.

What is the proper mailing list for discussing Jon's proposed text?

                Harald


--On 12. juli 2007 09:59 +0200 Brian E Carpenter 
<brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's inappropriate to use RFC 2119 terminology in this document.
> Section 2 should be deleted and any use of the capitalized words
> should become lower case.
> (draft-peterson-informational-normativity-00.txt will tell you why.)
>
> Section 3 is completely redundant and should be deleted.
>
> Otherwise, I support this version for BCP.
>
>      Brian
>
>
> On 2007-07-06 16:02, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> > As of last week, the community has been able to see what I hope closely
> > approximates a final version of our -incoming rights document:
> > draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-01, published June 28.
> >
> > Given that this is now present, I believe it is time to start the WG
> > Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-03.txt, published April 30.
> >
> > This Last Call will run from today, July 6, 2007, and end in 2 weeks, on
> > Friday, July 20, 2007, just prior to the next IETF meeting, where the
> > IPR WG has a scheduled slot on Monday, July 23.
> >
> > The list of issues raised against -outgoing will form one part of the
> > agenda in Chicago; the other part of the agenda will be looking at
> > -incoming.
> >
> > IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rigths-03 going to the
> > IESG for processing as a BCP document, please do the following:
> >
> > - Send a message to the IPR WG list with a subject line of the format
> > "LC ISSUE: OUTGOING <section>: <your issue>".
> >
> > If you have an issue with the principles of the -incoming document,
> > please do NOT use this format, but rather use a descriptive subject
> > line, and have discussion on the list.
> >
> > The chair will attempt to get all issues so noted into the issue tracker
> > before Chicago, and we will go through them there.
> >
> > The chair reserves the possiblity of not recording some issues, if that
> > seems like obviously the right thing to do (for instance, if two people
> > note exactly the same issue, only one will be tracked).
> >
> >                        Harald
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipr-wg mailing list
> > Ipr-wg at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg





_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg