It's inappropriate to use RFC 2119 terminology in this document.
Section 2 should be deleted and any use of the capitalized words
should become lower case.
(draft-peterson-informational-normativity-00.txt will tell you why.)
Section 3 is completely redundant and should be deleted.
Otherwise, I support this version for BCP.
Brian
On 2007-07-06 16:02, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
As of last week, the community has been able to see what I hope
closely approximates a final version of our -incoming rights
document: draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-01, published June 28.
Given that this is now present, I believe it is time to start the WG
Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-03.txt, published April 30.
This Last Call will run from today, July 6, 2007, and end in 2 weeks,
on Friday, July 20, 2007, just prior to the next IETF meeting, where
the IPR WG has a scheduled slot on Monday, July 23.
The list of issues raised against -outgoing will form one part of the
agenda in Chicago; the other part of the agenda will be looking at
-incoming.
IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rigths-03 going to
the IESG for processing as a BCP document, please do the following:
- Send a message to the IPR WG list with a subject line of the format
"LC ISSUE: OUTGOING <section>: <your issue>".
If you have an issue with the principles of the -incoming document,
please do NOT use this format, but rather use a descriptive subject
line, and have discussion on the list.
The chair will attempt to get all issues so noted into the issue
tracker before Chicago, and we will go through them there.
The chair reserves the possiblity of not recording some issues, if
that seems like obviously the right thing to do (for instance, if two
people note exactly the same issue, only one will be tracked).
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg