Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions

[Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

Making it possible to fix the boilerplate requirements without issuing a 
new RFC is indeed part of what we hope to achieve with the documents now 
in front of this WG. I hope our currently proposed text achieves that.
We're not trying to fix any specific problem with the existing procedure.

                  Harald

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> When attempting to submit several non-WG I-Ds recently, I discovered
> that xml2rfc produces copyright boilerplate that the Secretariat finds
> unacceptable. The offending text seems to be:
>
> "and at http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html";
>
> Bill Fenner suggests [1] that this construct was "accidentally outlawed"
> when RFC 3978 was published, and that fixing the problem is presumably a
> work item of the IPR WG. Is this indeed an active work item? (The
> xml2rfc workaround -- removing submissionType='independent' in the XML
> source -- seems to defeat the purpose of flagging the submission type.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peter
>
> [1]
> http://drakken.dbc.mtview.ca.us/pipermail/xml2rfc/2007-August/003155.html
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
>   


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg