[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions



On 2007-08-09 20:27, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
Making it possible to fix the boilerplate requirements without issuing a new RFC is indeed part of what we hope to achieve with the documents now in front of this WG. I hope our currently proposed text achieves that.
We're not trying to fix any specific problem with the existing procedure.

I agree with that, but...


Harald

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
When attempting to submit several non-WG I-Ds recently, I discovered
that xml2rfc produces copyright boilerplate that the Secretariat finds
unacceptable. The offending text seems to be:

"and at http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html";

Bill Fenner suggests [1] that this construct was "accidentally outlawed"
when RFC 3978 was published,

I'm not sure it was an accident. I suspect there was concern about creating legal ambiguity by citing two different sets of rules without stating which one takes precedence in case of conflict. When the Trust composes the future boilerplate, they'll need to consider this.

    Brian

and that fixing the problem is presumably a
work item of the IPR WG. Is this indeed an active work item? (The
xml2rfc workaround -- removing submissionType='independent' in the XML
source -- seems to defeat the purpose of flagging the submission type.)

Thanks!

Peter

[1]
http://drakken.dbc.mtview.ca.us/pipermail/xml2rfc/2007-August/003155.html


------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg