Re: Non-WG lists

["Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> you did notice that the IESG list is on the page?

Obviously not.  But I check... LOL, that's cheating
if it's new.

  [note well]
>> How does that differ from my second point ?  You 
>> said "nope, on both counts".

> It means that reuse of what you write isn't limited
> to "might be adopted in an IETF standard if it's a
> good idea" - you may also (to give another example 
> of reuse under 3978) see your words quoted in someone
> else's posting that explains why what you wrote is
> not such a good idea after all, for instance :-)

That's fair use, we're not yet at the point where I'd
need a patent lawyer for a flamewar, asbestos suffice ;-)

 Frank


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg