Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"ascodified in BCP78 and BCP79...

["Bill Fardy" <bfardy at comcast.net>]

>
> Right, and this is probably a rather common scenario.  The document
> should be reviewed to make sure it does the right thing in this regard.
> What I've seen from the discussion so far doesn't convince me that the
> text is sufficiently clear.
>

based on bcp78 (4.2.a) why would it not be reasonable for the ietf to assume
non-individual contributors are agents, and possess the apparent authority
to transfer rights in their contributions, including those owned by their
principal, i.e. the entity they work for and/or represent?



____________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg