RE: #1539 (was: WG Last Call - summary of issues)

[Black_David at emc.com]

+1 (ditto).

--David 

Frank Ellermann wrote: 
 
> Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> > Mailing list consensus seems to be that we want to say that 
> > contributors, by making a contribution, state that they have
> > the right to make the contribution; text should not make it
> > seem as if the contributors' employer or sponsor has to make
> > a statement.
> 
> +1
> 
> > I think we know what we want to accomplish in both cases, it's
> > a matter of getting the text to say what we want it to say.
>  
> > Once we have suggested text, we should be able to issue -05,
> > and have the documents reviewed by counsel to check that they
> > will say what we think they say also when they're being read
> > by a lawyer; thereafter, the documents will go to the IESG for
> > emission of an IETF Last Call.
> 
> Yes, let's check out the "outgoing rough consensus" prediction.
> 
>  Frank

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg