[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1539



+1 more

   Brian

On 2007-12-19 05:18, Black_David at emc.com wrote:
+1 (ditto).

--David

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Harald Alvestrand wrote:

Mailing list consensus seems to be that we want to say that contributors, by making a contribution, state that they have
the right to make the contribution; text should not make it
seem as if the contributors' employer or sponsor has to make
a statement.
+1

I think we know what we want to accomplish in both cases, it's
a matter of getting the text to say what we want it to say.
Once we have suggested text, we should be able to issue -05,
and have the documents reviewed by counsel to check that they
will say what we think they say also when they're being read
by a lawyer; thereafter, the documents will go to the IESG for
emission of an IETF Last Call.
Yes, let's check out the "outgoing rough consensus" prediction.

Frank

_______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg