ADMIN: Offtopic warning (second topic) (Re: #1539 proposed resolution)

[Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

Todd,

TS Glassey skrev:
>
> This DOESNT work. It MUST certify that all of the key documents are
> read and agreed to. That means the language MUST read something to
> closer to
>
>> 5.1. General Policy
>>   By submission of a Contribution, each person actually submitting the
>>   Contribution, and each named co-Contributor, certifies that they
>> have read and agree to the terms and conditions for submitting IP for
>> vetting to the IETF.
you have been insisting that the WG should use the term "vetting" at
least since 2003, with zero indication that the WG agrees with you.

I'm adding "vetting" to "transfer" as subjects that will get your
privilleges suspended for off-topic posting.

                       Harald


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg