Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version

[Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>]

Todd:

> > My messages on this thread have nothing to do with any comments you 
> > may have raised.  I was responding to concerns raised by Cullen, 
> > who does not want the RFC published until the IETF Trust has made 
> > their posting that will be referenced by the RFC.
>
> > Either Ed or I can confirm that the IETF Trust posting has occurred 
> > to the RFC Editor when they believe the document is otherwise read 
> > to be published as an RFC.
>
> Uh... "believe"? - When the Editors publishes something they need to 
> more than believe that something is ready. They need to be capable 
> of demonstrating to anyone's concern that this is true, including US Courts.

The IETF Standards process is being used to demonstrate rough 
consensus for the document content.

Russ 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg