Jorge - Answer these question - or face litigation and the ethics committee of your licensing bar assoc's

["TS Glassey" <tglassey at earthlink.net>]

Jorge -

I asked you these same questions a number of times,  and you have 
intentionally answered any number of other questions rather than the ones I 
have asked, and you have done so in a manner that tries to invalidate the 
questions that were asked.

I now have formal proof of my commentary about how the IETF's filing process 
prevents IP Patent's from being filed either here in the US or Japan based 
on the works of the IETF being formally included in the definition of PRIOR 
ART by the US Patent office and the Japanese Patent office.  So unless you 
can disprove this commentary, it will have to stand as the truth.It also 
will formally put the IPR WG and more importantly their sponsor's that the 
IETF's conspiracy and direct actions in trying to make US Patent's 
impossible to protect just blew up in its face...

Here are the questions as they were asked...

1)  YES OR NO?:   Under certain circumstances could the publication of IETF 
documents prevent Japanese Patent's from being granted for a Prior Art 
violations?  YES or NO?:

Here is some good JPO info...
http://www.epo.org/patents/patent-information/east-asian/helpdesk/japan/faq.html

http://www.jpo.go.jp/cgi/linke.cgi?url=/seido_e/s_gaiyou_e/4houe.htm

   2)  YES OR NO?:  Does the publication of IETF documents trigger the one 
year time-clocks on registering materials described in those documents for 
US patent protection? i.e. could the IETF's publication of documents 
interact with or proscribe US and foreign patent filings in some instances? 
YES or NO?:

In re this question, my research at the US PTO is below. It tells me that 
this also is true so unless you can tell me otherwise... According to the US 
PTO apparently all Scientific Publications are considered PRIOR ART 
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2128.htm .

Also notice the comment at the bottom of the page "about not having to ever 
have been read" just submitted to the IETF. That means whether the IETF 
publishes of not doesn't matter. Registering the IP with the IETF Trust for 
publication is the act which topples  your house of cards. If you need more 
see also http://www.iusmentis.com/patents/priorart/#whatispriorart for a 
rolling
layman's commentary on the issue of PRIOR ART.

As long as we are at it. Lets ask another nasty one...

   3) YES or NO?:  Does the IETF's "respect of other's IP's" per the 
description of BCP78 ss 3.1 include US and Foreign patents?  YES or NO?:

So Jorge - unless you are formally saying the US and Japanese Patent 
Office's websites are wrong, can you please answer the two questions above 
please formally here for Ray and the IETF Chair? And especially Question 3 
before I have a Judge tell you to answer these same questions in a Court of 
Law. One which we both know will in fact happen if you don't answer those 
questions formally here.

Jorge - [in my best Pee Wee Herman] I'm Still Waiting.


---
Personal Disclaimers Apply

TS Glassey 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg