[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?

To: "chair at ietf.org" <chair at ietf.org>, "ipr-wg at ietf.org" <ipr-wg at ietf.org>
Subject: Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?
From: Todd Glassey <tglassey at earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:28:13 -0700
Delivered-to: ipr-wg at core3.amsl.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=pGPvnT+kB6vygcl66vul6ETgYRNayGndQEG4X9NRhpXxDTNN1iPGuWYRoZVox9Rl; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg>
List-help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Chair - why is a RFC being obsoleted by an Internet-Draft?

Seems to me like an impossibility. No I-D can in and of itself strip anyRFC document without issuing a new RFC to replace the old one. Since anI-D is NOT a RFC this is an issue.

This is a problem per se like this one...http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06


Todd Glassey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?
  - From: Todd Glassey

Prev by Date: Re: [Nea] IESG query re Expert Review
Next by Date: Re: Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?
Previous by thread: Re: [Nea] IESG query re Expert Review
Next by thread: Re: Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread