IPR-WG Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: TLS-authz "experimental" standard and RESPONSIBILITY TO PUBLISH, TS Glassey
• Question about IETF process which is unanswered yet., TS Glassey
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Updated minutes from Vancouver meeting, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• New Item for consideration - Read Acknologement Requirement..., todd glassey
  • Re: New Item for consideration - Read Acknologement Requirement..., Frank Ellermann
• Duke University has a good "Inventor" definition - which is useful in constraining the term "contributor"., TS Glassey
• Disclosure of Sponsor's and #1539, TS Glassey
• Off Topic - Best Christmas wishes..., TS Glassey
  • Re: Off Topic - Best Christmas wishes..., Frank Ellermann
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Outbound Draft, Joel M. Halpern
• #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, Harald Alvestrand
  • RE: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, Black_David
    • Re: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, TS Glassey
      • RE: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, Black_David
  • Re: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, TS Glassey
    • ADMIN: Offtopic warning (second topic) (Re: #1539 proposed resolution), Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: #1539 proposed resolution: Incoming 5.1 and 5.3: Language referring to contributors' sponsors, Frank Ellermann
• Minutes from the Vancouver meeting, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Minutes from the Vancouver meeting, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Minutes from the Vancouver meeting, Frank Ellermann
• WG Last Call - summary of issues, Harald Alvestrand
  • #1539 (was: WG Last Call - summary of issues), Frank Ellermann
    • RE: #1539 (was: WG Last Call - summary of issues), Black_David
      • Re: #1539, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: WG Last Call - summary of issues, Harald Alvestrand
• Concerns about the NoteWell Data Evidence., TS Glassey
• Copyright transfer flaws - The difference between owning IP rights and literary rights. - Terminating the LC, TS Glassey
• Retention policy for list's and the processes which show the lists integrity, TS Glassey
  • Re: Retention policy for list's and the processes which show the lists integrity, Frank Ellermann
• Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., TS Glassey
  • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Don Armstrong
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., TS Glassey
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Frank Ellermann
      • ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, TS Glassey
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Simon Josefsson
      • Review by counsel [Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Review by counsel [Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations], Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, todd glassey
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, TS Glassey
      • #1539: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: #1539: incoming 5.1, 5.3: requires participation of organizations, TS Glassey
      • RE: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Black_David
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Simon Josefsson
      • RE: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Black_David
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., todd glassey
      • RE: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Black_David
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., todd glassey
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"ascodified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Bill Fardy
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"ascodified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor" as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Don Armstrong
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., TS Glassey
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Russ Housley
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., Don Armstrong
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent theSponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., TS Glassey
      • Message not available
      • Re: Stupid question: How are "the rights to represent the Sponsor"as codified in BCP78 and BCP79..., TS Glassey
• Use of open source code, George Willingmyre
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: Sample code (was: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc), Tom Petch
  • Re: Sample code (was: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Sample code, TS Glassey
  • Re: Sample code, Frank Ellermann
• Addition to "advice to trust" part of agenda: Submission procedures for IETF contributions, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Addition to "advice to trust" part of agenda: Submission procedures for IETF contributions, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Addition to "advice to trust" part of agenda: Submission procedures for IETF contributions, Frank Ellermann
• Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Russ Housley
  • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Simon Josefsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Russ Housley
    • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, TS Glassey
      • Understanding IP Rights contributions in a SDO... DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, TS Glassey
      • ISSUE: incoming 5: work for hire, Black_David
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5: work for hire, Harald Alvestrand
      • RE: ISSUE: incoming 5: work for hire, Black_David
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5: work for hire, TS Glassey
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5: work for hire, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Understanding IP Rights contributions in a SDO... DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Understanding IP Rights contributions in a SDO... DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, todd glassey
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, TS Glassey
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, Harald Alvestrand
      • Sample code (was: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Sample code, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Sample code, TS Glassey
      • Re: Sample code, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Sample code, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Sample code, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Sample code, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Sample code, Simon Josefsson
      • ADMIN: Dead horse beating is not on-topic (Re: Sample code), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Fwd: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc, todd glassey
• Fwd: BCP78/79 concern: The effect of Lorrain v Markel on the IETF IPR Logging and Transfer process., Russ Housley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fwd: BCP78/79 concern: The effect of Lorrain v Markel on the IETF IPR Logging and Transfer process., Harald Alvestrand
• BCP78/79 concern: The effect of Lorrain v Markel on the IETF IPR Logging and Transfer process., TS Glassey
  • Re: BCP78/79 concern: The effect of Lorrain v Markel on the IETF IPR Logging and Transfer process., Peter Saint-Andre
    • Re: BCP78/79 concern: The effect of Lorrain v Markel on the IETF IPR Logging and Transfer process., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• ISSUE incoming 5.3: right to sub-license, Simon Josefsson
  • #1517: Incoming 5.3: right to sub-license, Harald Alvestrand
• ISSUE: incoming 5.7: stale reference to section 5.4?, Simon Josefsson
  • #1516: incoming 5.7: stale reference to section 5.4?, Harald Alvestrand
• ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Simon Josefsson
  • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Joel M. Halpern
    • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Scott Brim
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Simon Josefsson
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', Scott Brim
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', TS Glassey
      • Re: ISSUE: incoming 5.6: redefines 'Contributor', John C Klensin
  • #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, TS Glassey
      • Re: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, TS Glassey
      • ADMIN: Offtopic warning, Harald Alvestrand
      • Proposed resolution: #1515: Incoming 5.6: "Contributor" used with 2 meanings, Harald Alvestrand
• WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, John Calhoon (LCA)
    • Re: WG Last Call for IPR -incoming document, Harald Alvestrand
• IPR agenda for Vancouver, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: IPR agenda for Vancouver, TS Glassey
    • Glassey's suspension from the IPR WG mailing list (Re: IPR agenda for Vancouver), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Glassey's suspension from the IPR WG mailing list (Re: IPR agenda for Vancouver), TS Glassey
    • RE: IPR agenda for Vancouver, Walls, Endre
      • Re: IPR agenda for Vancouver, TS Glassey
      • RE: IPR agenda for Vancouver, Walls, Endre
      • Re: IPR agenda for Vancouver, TS Glassey
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?, Simon Josefsson
    • Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?, Harald Alvestrand
      • ISSUE incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative (was: Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?), Simon Josefsson
      • #1514: incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative, Harald Alvestrand
• Status of issues, November 13, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Status of issues, November 13, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Status of issues, November 13, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Status of issues, November 13, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Status of issues, November 13, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Status of issues, November 13, Frank Ellermann
• Submission of XML sources, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Submission of XML sources, Fred Baker
    • OpenOffice makes it OK to submit .docs to the IETF - Was Re: Submission of XML sources, todd glassey
    • Re: Submission of XML sources, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Submission of XML sources, Fred Baker
      • Re: Submission of XML sources, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Submission of XML sources, Russ Housley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Submission of XML sources, Fred Baker
• Re: I-D Action:draft-hallambaker-ipr-patent-harmonization-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I-D Action:draft-hallambaker-ipr-patent-harmonization-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: I-D Action:draft-hallambaker-ipr-patent-harmonization-00.txt, Powers Chuck-RXCP20
• Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
  • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Black_David
    • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Joel M. Halpern
    • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
  • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
• Suggestion - lets create a workflow and requirements model., TS Glassey
• "no license required for implementers", Pekka Savola
  • Re: "no license required for implementers", Scott Brim
• If you thought this was easy....., Harald Alvestrand
• [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Scott Brim
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], TS Glassey
      • RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Powers Chuck-RXCP20
      • RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], stewe
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], TS Glassey
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], TS Glassey
  • OT? Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], TS Glassey
    • Re: OT? Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: OT? Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-01.txt], TS Glassey
• New Schedule of charges for IP matters in South Korea, JKL Patent Law Firm
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Richard Stallman
• Innocence lost for this newbie AD..., Tim Polk
  • BS - Re: Innocence lost for this newbie AD..., TS Glassey
    • OT: Innocence lost for this newbie AD..., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: OT: Innocence lost for this newbie AD..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: OT: Innocence lost for this newbie AD..., TS Glassey
• Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, TS Glassey
  • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Simon Josefsson
  • RE: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen
    • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Keith Moore
      • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Ted Hardie
• I brought this up a while ago and its time to bring this up again..., TS Glassey
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Henning Schulzrinne
  • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
    • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, todd glassey
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, todd glassey
    • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Black_David
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Black_David
      • Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, TS Glassey
• [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Joel M. Halpern
    • RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Powers Chuck-RXCP20
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Simon Josefsson
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Ted Hardie
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], TS Glassey
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], TS Glassey
      • RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Scott Brim
      • RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt], Powers Chuck-RXCP20
  • Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00.txt, Simon Josefsson
• Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • RE: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen
    • Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Ted Hardie
    • Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Alvestrand
• #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Black_David
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors inresulting RFCs, TS Glassey
      • RE: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors inresulting RFCs, Black_David
      • What is the IP Package contained in a Standard's Run... Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authorsinresulting RFCs, TS Glassey
      • Suggested new item to add - a Hold Harmless Language Addition - Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authorsinresulting RFCs, TS Glassey
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, TS Glassey
      • ADMIN: Suspending the posting permission of T.S. Glassey (Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs), Harald Alvestrand
      • RE: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Black_David
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Alvestrand
      • Logic Flaw - Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, TS Glassey
      • RE: Logic Flaw - Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to documentauthors in resulting RFCs, Walls, Endre
      • RE: Logic Flaw - Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to documentauthors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
      • Re: #1511: Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
    • #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
      • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John Calhoon (LCA)
      • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John Calhoon (LCA)
      • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
      • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Black_David
      • RE: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, John C Klensin
      • Re: #1511: Proposed resolution of Incoming 5.10: Back-license to document authors in resulting RFCs, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: I-D Action:draft-josefsson-free-standards-howto-01.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Simon Josefsson
  • Re: A priori IPR choices, Theodore Tso
    • Re: A priori IPR choices, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: A priori IPR choices, stephen . farrell
• IPR - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 70 (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-02.txt, Frank Ellermann
    • Non-WG lists (Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-02.txt), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Non-WG lists (Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-02.txt), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Non-WG lists, Frank Ellermann
• Re: WCP 83 (was: [name]...[name] Suspension), todd glassey
• Harald...Deans Suspension, TS Glassey
  • Re: Harald...Deans Suspension, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: Harald...Deans Suspension, TS Glassey
      • Re: Harald...Deans Suspension, TS Glassey
  • WCP 83 (was: [name]...[name] Suspension), Frank Ellermann
• [Fwd: ipr - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 70], Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: ipr - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 70], TS Glassey
• -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Simon Josefsson
    • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, TS Glassey
      • Spelling error - Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, TS Glassey
    • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, TS Glassey
  • Re: -Incoming issues in need of resolution, Brian E Carpenter
• ADMIN: Suspension of posting privilleges for Dean Anderson, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (fwd), Dean Anderson
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dean Anderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dean Anderson
    • Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dean Anderson
    • Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dean Anderson
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Minutes from Chicago, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Minutes from Chicago, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: Minutes from Chicago, John C Klensin
      • Re: Minutes from Chicago, todd glassey
  • Re: Minutes from Chicago, Brian E Carpenter
• copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, todd glassey
    • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Bill Fenner
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, todd glassey
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Bill Fenner
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, John C Klensin
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Russ Housley
      • Message not available
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, John C Klensin
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Russ Housley
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, TS Glassey
      • Re: copyright boilerplate for independent submissions, Brian E Carpenter
• sometimes hiding things from a standards body hurts, Scott O. Bradner
• Incoming - Definitions and Clarity, Ray Pelletier
• SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility and extending the IETF's processes to include proprietary efforts., TS Glassey
  • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Simon Josefsson
  • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, todd glassey
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, TS Glassey
      • RE: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Lawrence Rosen
      • RE: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • RE: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Lawrence Rosen
      • RE: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, todd glassey
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, Bill Fardy
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, John C Klensin
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, TS Glassey
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, TS Glassey
      • Re: SPARC Author Addendum compatibility, todd glassey
• Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Joel M. Halpern
      • RE: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Black_David
      • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Review of outbound-03: Major issues, todd glassey
    • Concensus and oversight for bad decisions..., todd glassey
• Review of outbound-03: Minor issues, Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Review of outbound-03: Minor issues, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: Review of outbound-03: Minor issues, Simon Josefsson
• An example of the outbound rights problem, Sam Hartman
  • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, todd glassey
      • Re: An example of the outbound rights problem, todd glassey
• Issues from the tracker that I believe are resolved, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Two issues closed, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Collective rights: Quote from US law, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Collective rights: Quote from US law, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Collective rights: Quote from US law, Ted Hardie
      • Re: Collective rights: Quote from US law, todd glassey
  • Re: Collective rights: Quote from US law, TS Glassey
• I'm stepping down as chair, Steven M. Bellovin
• Agenda for our Chicago meeting, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Incoming - software licenses, Black_David
  • Re: Incoming - software licenses, Simon Josefsson
    • RE: Incoming - software licenses, Black_David
      • Re: Incoming - software licenses, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Incoming - software licenses, Black_David
      • Re: Incoming - software licenses, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Incoming - software licenses, Black_David
      • RE: Incoming - software licenses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Incoming - software licenses, TS Glassey
      • Re: Incoming - software licenses, TS Glassey
      • Re: Incoming - software licenses, Joel M. Halpern
• WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], Scott Brim
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], John C Klensin
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Sections 2 and 3: Editorial [Re: WG LAST CALL on the -outgoing document], Brian E Carpenter
    • #1499 Outgoing LC 2 3: RFC 2119 terminology, Harald Alvestrand
  • LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
    • #1500 Outgoing LC 6.3: SW licensing, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Simon Josefsson
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Ted Hardie
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, John C Klensin
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
      • Re: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Simon Josefsson
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Black_David
      • Message not available
      • RE: LC ISSUE: OUTGOING Section 6.3: vague s/w licensing guidance, Joel M. Halpern
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• 2nd response - the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, todd glassey
• Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, todd glassey
  • Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, todd glassey
      • Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, Graham Murray
      • Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, todd glassey
      • Re: the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, C.T. Aiken
      • Re: the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, Bill Fardy
      • Re: the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, TS Glassey
      • Re: the usual email disclaimer nonsense, was LTANS WG Last Call, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, Tobias Gondrom
      • Re: LTANS WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt, todd glassey
• New EU Anti-Copyright Violation Rule info..., todd glassey
• Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Thierry Moreau
  • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Scott W Brim
    • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, todd glassey
  • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Lucy Lynch
      • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, todd glassey
      • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, Thierry Moreau
  • Patent policy and this mailing list (Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG), Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG, todd glassey
• Admin note: The IPR design team, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Admin note: The IPR design team, Don Armstrong
    • Re: Admin note: The IPR design team, todd glassey
• I have requested a 2-hour slot for Chicago, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Todd Glassey
• Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, todd glassey
  • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, todd glassey
      • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, todd glassey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, Todd Glassey
    • Re: Software as Intangible Bit Streams -- News at 11, Don Armstrong
    • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, Graham Murray
      • Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • RE: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), Black_David
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • RE: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), Black_David
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • RE: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), Black_David
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • RE: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), Contreras, Jorge
      • RE: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), Contreras, Jorge
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), TS Glassey
      • Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods... - UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • Typo - Re: Form of incorporation of organizations (Re: Software asGoods...- UCC Article 9, def #44), todd glassey
      • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: Software as Goods... - UCC Article 9, def #44, John C Klensin
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-03.txt, todd glassey
  • Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Simon Josefsson
    • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, John C Klensin
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, todd glassey
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Don Armstrong
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Section 6.5: Additional Licenses for IETF Contributions, Harald Alvestrand