IPR-WG Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Re: Outgoing section 5.5 and draft-josefsson (Re: San Diego meeting slot), (continued)
Problem with the BCP 78 Rights assignment., todd glassey
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update has ended, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update has ended, Lucy E. Lynch
  - Re: IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update has ended, todd glassey
    - Re: IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update has ended, Lucy E. Lynch
Last Call: 'RFC 3978 Update to recognize the IETF Trust' to BCP (draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update), The IESG
- Re: Last Call: 'RFC 3978 Update to recognize the IETF Trust' to BCP (draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update), Simon Josefsson
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-02.txt, Harald Alvestrand
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-02.txt, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Request for publication of draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01 as a BCP, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Request for publication of draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01 as a BCP, Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Request for publication of draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01 as a BCP, Todd Glassey
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Todd Glassey
- Re: Summary of revised Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update, Todd Glassey
Question about the Parole Evidence Rule and how it relates to the documents we have now..., todd glassey
- RFP and BCP addition - receipt needs to be generated & RFC's that revise IETF process., todd glassey
Re: RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?, Frank Ellermann
- Re: RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?, todd glassey
Re: administrative question on RFC publications, todd glassey
WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Bill Fenner
  - Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Ted Hardie
  - Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Scott W Brim
  - Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, todd glassey
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Simon Josefsson
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WG Last Call reissuing: draft-ietf-rules-update-07, Scott Bradner
Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], Todd Glassey
RE: Terms used in rules-update-07, Contreras, Jorge
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Terms used in rules-update-07, Contreras, Jorge
- RE: Terms used in rules-update-07, John C Klensin
  - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, John C Klensin
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Ted Hardie
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, John C Klensin
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Ted Hardie
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, John C Klensin
- RE: Terms used in rules-update-07, Contreras, Jorge
- RE: Terms used in rules-update-07, Todd Glassey
- Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Todd Glassey
RE: problems caused by rules-update-07 (was: Re: WG Last Call ondraft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt), Contreras, Jorge
- Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, Simon Josefsson
Re: #1339: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Todd Glassey
RE: #1339: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rightsto modify source, Contreras, Jorge
WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Simon Josefsson
- problems caused by rules-update-07 (was: Re: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt), Simon Josefsson
  - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, Scott W Brim
  - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, todd glassey
    - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: problems caused by rules-update-07, todd glassey
- Terms used in rules-update-07, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Bill Fenner
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Frank Ellermann
    - Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], todd glassey
    - Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], Fred Baker
    - Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], todd glassey
    - Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], Simon Josefsson
    - Re: Origin of RFCs [Re: Terms used in rules-update-07], Brian E Carpenter
Jorge... Bravo!, todd glassey
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Contreras, Jorge
  - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-07.txt, Scott W Brim
Question about the folks providing the WG Mailing List services?, todd glassey
- Re: Question about the folks providing the WG Mailing List services?, Fred Baker
  - WAS Re: Question about the folks providing... IS now - BCP101 - What a freaking JOKE..., todd glassey
    - Re: WAS Re: Question about the folks providing... IS now - BCP101 -What a freaking JOKE..., todd glassey
Would the IPR working group consider allowing a SPONSORS SHEET to be added to the ID or RFC's, todd glassey
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-ietf-trust-update-00.txt, Lucy E. Lynch
Missing piueces of the submission and participation process, todd glassey
Why not change the text?, Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Why not change the text?, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Why not change the text?, Brian E Carpenter
Liability Waiver Statement for BCP's - (Jorge pls respond), todd glassey
The Death of the IETF - SOX compliance and its effect on the IETF, todd glassey
Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Bill Fenner
- Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Scott Bradner
  - Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Scott W Brim
    - Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, todd glassey
  - Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, todd glassey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, todd . glassey
- Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Scott Bradner
- RE: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Contreras, Jorge
  - Message not available
    - RE: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, todd glassey
  - Re: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?, todd glassey
Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Black_David
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, todd glassey
  - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Bede B. McCall
    - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Don Armstrong
    - The solution is compromise... Re: Comments to WG meeting, todd glassey
    - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Black_David
  - Message not available
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Joel M. Halpern
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Bede B. McCall
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Don Armstrong
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Black_David
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, todd glassey
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Black_David
  - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: Comments to WG meeting, todd glassey
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Black_David
  - Message not available
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Christian Huitema
    - Message not available
    - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Contreras, Jorge
  - RE: Comments to WG meeting, Simon Josefsson
- RE: Comments to WG meeting, Contreras, Jorge
Example of RFC 3978 incompatible license in draft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt, Simon Josefsson
- RE: Example of RFC 3978 incompatible license indraft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt, David B Harrington
  - RE: Example of RFC 3978 incompatible license indraft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: Example of RFC 3978 incompatible license indraft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Example of RFC 3978 incompatible license indraft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt, Simon Josefsson
URLs and the location boilerplate, Bede B. McCall
- Re: URLs and the location boilerplate, Bill Fenner
  - Re: URLs and the location boilerplate, todd glassey
    - RE: URLs and the location boilerplate, Bede B. McCall
    - Re: URLs and the location boilerplate, todd glassey
NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Bill Fenner
- Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Pekka Savola
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", todd glassey
  - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Simon Josefsson
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Bill Fenner
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", todd glassey
    - Re: NEW ITEM: "Normally placed at the end", todd glassey
- #1338: "Normally placed at the end", Harald Alvestrand
NEW ITEM: Notices and Rights Required in RFC Editor Contributions, Bill Fenner
- Re: NEW ITEM: Notices and Rights Required in RFC Editor Contributions, todd glassey
- #1337: Notices and Rights Required in RFC Editor Contributions, Harald Alvestrand
Comments on draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00, Elwyn Davies
- Re: Comments on draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00, Simon Josefsson
  - NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, todd glassey
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights tomodify source, todd glassey
    - #1339: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1339: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source, Simon Josefsson
Dumb Question... Doesnt the Publication of the TEMPLATE under the ANY and ALL Uses give away all rights to the TM and CR statements?, todd glassey
The Link to the derivative works rules is broken..., todd glassey
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
EU requires Safe harbor doesnt it?, todd glassey
Confusing COPYRIGHTS and USE RIGHTS... They are not the same thing., todd glassey
Is there a set of rules for how the WG Operators must act and comply with?, todd glassey
Ticket status, June 27, 2006, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006, todd glassey
  - Copyrights, Use Licenses and protecting the IETF from its own acts..., todd glassey
  - "New" issues not pursued (Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006), Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: "New" issues not pursued (Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006), todd glassey
    - Re: "New" issues not pursued (Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006), Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: "New" issues not pursued (Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006), todd glassey
- draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00 [Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006], Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00 [Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006], Simon Josefsson
    - Re: draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00 [Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006], todd glassey
    - Re: draft-josefsson-ipr-notices-00 [Re: Ticket status, June 27, 2006], Florian Weimer
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
NEW ISSUES - The SAFEHARBOR & COPYRIGHT Protections require a formal take-down policy otherwise the IETF is always liable, todd glassey
Submissions and Notewell - Question about the Fraudulent Conveyance of IP Titles., todd glassey
ADMIN: PLEASE change the subject line!, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
    - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
    - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
    - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, bmanning
    - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
  - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Ken Raeburn
    - Message not available
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Jeffrey Hutzelman
  - RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, David Harrington
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Andy Bierman
  - Message not available
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Masataka Ohta
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Vijay Devarapallli
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
    - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric
  - Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
  - Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bill Fenner
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, John Loughney
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Burger, Eric
  - RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Lawrence Rosen
NEW ITEM - Since Patent Rights are tied to first publication dates, the IETF's publishing documents starts those timers., todd glassey
NEW Item... - Use Limitation Caveat Statement., todd glassey
Possible NEW item - Additional IPR Timing Boilerplate., todd glassey
#1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
  - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
- RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, David B Harrington
  - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
- RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
  - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Don Armstrong
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Scott W Brim
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Harald Alvestrand
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, David B Harrington
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Thomas Narten
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, David B Harrington
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Don Armstrong
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, David B Harrington
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Lawrence Rosen
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Don Armstrong
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Don Armstrong
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, David B Harrington
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Ted Hardie
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Graham Murray
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - New Release components - OpenSource submissions Guide - Was: Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
    - RE: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, John C Klensin
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
  - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, todd glassey
- Re: #1175 Code vs text - second attempt at resolution, Tom Petch
Status of IETF Policies and Rules, Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Status of IETF Policies and Rules, todd glassey
  - Re: Status of IETF Policies and Rules, todd glassey
  - RE: Status of IETF Policies and Rules, Lawrence Rosen
Question about Tax Liabilities and the IETF's document portfolio and its worth..., todd glassey
RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Black_David
- Copyright transfer [was Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents], Brian E Carpenter
RE: Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process."what if the IP value > $500 USD?", Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Question for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process."what if the IP value > $500 USD?", todd glassey
#1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1175 Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
  - Re: #1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, todd glassey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: #1175 Code vs text, John C Klensin
  - Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), John C Klensin
    - Re: Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), todd glassey
    - Re: Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Rights that expire in 6 months (Re: #1175 Code vs text), todd glassey
  - Re: #1175 Code vs text, Thomas Narten
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, John C Klensin
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, Joel M. Halpern
    - Asking the real questions (was: Re: #1175 Code vs text), John C Klensin
    - NoteWell is Broken..., todd glassey
    - Re: #1175 Code vs text, todd glassey
    - Why include boilerplate in I-Ds [Re: #1175 Code vs text], Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Why include boilerplate in I-Ds [Re: #1175 Code vs text], Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: Why include boilerplate in I-Ds [Re: #1175 Code vs text], John C Klensin
    - Re: Why include boilerplate in I-Ds [Re: #1175 Code vs text], Brian E Carpenter
#1167 Excerpt labelling - resolution, summary of discussion, Harald Alvestrand
#1166 Quotations - debate summary, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1166 Quotations - debate summary, John C Klensin
- Proposal to add a Set of Outgoing Use Statements, todd glassey
Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process." what if the IP value > $500 USD?", todd glassey
do not feed the trolls, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: do not feed the trolls, todd glassey
  - Re: do not feed the trolls, Fred Baker
Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
- #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Harald Alvestrand
  - PROPOSED NEW ISSUE... In Submitting a Document there are TWO pieces of IP being considered for Publication., todd glassey
  - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Ted Hardie
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
    - RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, David B Harrington
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., todd glassey
    - Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so..., todd glassey
    - RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Lawrence Rosen
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
  - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Simon Josefsson
    - IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents", Spencer Dawkins
    - Re: IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents", Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETFdocuments", Spencer Dawkins
    - Re: IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETFdocuments", Henrik Levkowetz
    - Re: IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETFdocuments", Simon Josefsson
    - Re: IDNits checking for "Additional Copyright notices in IETFdocuments", Thomas Narten
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, Contreras, Jorge
  - Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents, todd glassey
Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
- Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand
  - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Scott W Brim
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
  - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
    - RE: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, David B Harrington
    - Re: Internet Draft Description - New Language?, todd glassey
Question about copyright text..., todd glassey
- Re: Question about copyright text..., Harald Alvestrand
RE: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), Contreras, Jorge
Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Ted Hardie
  - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), todd glassey
  - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), John C Klensin
  - RE: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), David B Harrington
    - Re: A simpler idea, Simon Josefsson
- RE: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Contreras, Jorge
  - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Spencer Dawkins
Stanford University's Fair Use Copyright Site..., todd glassey
Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", bmanning
  - Re: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.", Contreras, Jorge
#1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
  - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
    - No Excerpt Rights are needed... Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
  - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Tom Petch
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Ted Hardie
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, John C Klensin
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, todd glassey
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Tom Petch
    - Re: #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?, Simon Josefsson
Question about how IPR Rights will be recorded., todd glassey
Fw: [Politech] Redlined version of Bush administration's proposal to expand DMCA [ip], todd glassey
- Re: Fw: [Politech] Redlined version of Bush administration's proposal to expand DMCA [ip], Harald Alvestrand
#1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
  - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
  - #1166 and derived works? (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), Harald Alvestrand
  - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Spencer Dawkins
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
    - ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
    - What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
    - Re: What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling), todd glassey
    - Re: What if...hypothetical, Joel M. Halpern
    - Re: What if...hypothetical, todd glassey
    - Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling, todd glassey
#1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Spencer Dawkins
  - Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, John C Klensin
    - Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution, Brian E Carpenter
    - Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), John C Klensin
    - Re: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution), todd glassey
    - Re: Fair use and case analysis, Harald Alvestrand
    - Re: Fair use and case analysis, John C Klensin
    - A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Simon Josefsson
    - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Ted Hardie
    - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), Don Armstrong
    - Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis), todd glassey

Mail converted by MHonArc