IPR-WG Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- RE: Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process."what if the IP value > $500 USD?",
Contreras, Jorge
- #1175 Code vs text,
Harald Alvestrand
- #1167 Excerpt labelling - resolution, summary of discussion,
Harald Alvestrand
- #1166 Quotations - debate summary,
Harald Alvestrand
- Quesiton for Jorge about IP Valuation and the Submission Process." what if the IP value > $500 USD?",
todd glassey
- do not feed the trolls,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Harald Alvestrand
- PROPOSED NEW ISSUE... In Submitting a Document there are TWO pieces of IP being considered for Publication.,
todd glassey
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Ted Hardie
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
todd glassey
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
todd glassey
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
todd glassey
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
todd glassey
- RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
David B Harrington
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so...,
todd glassey
- Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so...,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Does the IETF's relationship qualify as a contract? - I think so...,
todd glassey
- RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- RE: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
todd glassey
- Re: #1282 Re: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents,
Contreras, Jorge
- Internet Draft Description - New Language?,
todd glassey
- Question about copyright text...,
todd glassey
- RE: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution),
Contreras, Jorge
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis),
John C Klensin
- Stanford University's Fair Use Copyright Site...,
todd glassey
- Question for Jorge: "Distribution of this memo is unlimited.",
Brian E Carpenter
- #1273 How do we usefully define "excerpt"?,
Harald Alvestrand
- Question about how IPR Rights will be recorded.,
todd glassey
- Fw: [Politech] Redlined version of Bush administration's proposal to expand DMCA [ip],
todd glassey
- #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Simon Josefsson
- #1166 and derived works? (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling),
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
todd glassey
- ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling),
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling),
todd glassey
- What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling),
todd glassey
- Re: What if... - question about how this is supposed to work - Re: ADMIN: #1198 is closed (Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling),
todd glassey
- Re: What if...hypothetical,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: What if...hypothetical,
todd glassey
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1167 Excerpt labelling,
todd glassey
- #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
John C Klensin
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
Brian E Carpenter
- Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution),
John C Klensin
- Re: Fair use and case analysis (was: Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution),
todd glassey
- Re: Fair use and case analysis,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Fair use and case analysis,
John C Klensin
- A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis),
Simon Josefsson
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis),
Ted Hardie
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis),
Don Armstrong
- Re: A simpler idea (was: Re: Fair use and case analysis),
todd glassey
- Re: A simpler idea,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
todd glassey
- Re: #1166 Quotations from RFCs and I-Ds - suggested resolution,
Simon Josefsson
- Minutes uploaded,
Harald Alvestrand
- FW: [CNI-(C)] Re: IETF/source code copyright status,
Lawrence Rosen
- Draft minutes, IPR WG,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [CNI-(C)] Copyright status of early Internet RFCs,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures,
Black_David
- Resolution of #1245 - Does describing a technology require a license from the people who originally described it?,
Harald Alvestrand
- Issue #1238 Shoud secretariat ask for IPR clarification from IPR holders on 3rd party IPR disclosures,
Harald Alvestrand
- SOFTEWARE PATENT Insttiute... Emailing: www.spi.org,
todd glassey
- Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244,
todd glassey
- RE: Resolution of tickets 1197, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244,
John Calhoon \(LCA\)
- A note about copyright notices,
Harald Alvestrand
- IPR disclosures for individual submissions,
Sam Hartman
- Why multiple copyrights notices may be useful,
Simon Josefsson
- [Fwd: Audio Info],
Harald Alvestrand
- Todd Glassey's issues list,
Harald Alvestrand
- Updated agenda, IPR wg,
Harald Alvestrand
- Jorge - I see a federal judge today stopped the Nortious BIG's album today...,
todd glassey
- Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?,
todd . glassey
- 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?,
todd glassey
- Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: 7th, 8th, 9th, & 10th issues, and commentary on why the other 6 havent been posted to the ISSUES list?,
Harald Alvestrand
- resend - this did not seem to make it the 1st time,
Scott Bradner
- ISSUE - Submission Release Failures... - The Syslog Example.,
todd glassey
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Scott Bradner
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Scott W Brim
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
todd glassey
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Scott Bradner
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Scott Bradner
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
todd glassey
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
bmanning
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
todd glassey
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Pekka Savola
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re; 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
todd . glassey
- 3rd Party Disclosure problem in RFC 3979,
Thomas Narten
- ISSUES -3 new additions for the ISSUES list.,
todd glassey
- Fw: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
todd glassey
- Tentative agenda, IPR WG session in Dallas,
Harald Alvestrand
- NOTE-WELL Participation...,
todd glassey
- Does under Title 35, a submission to the IETF constitute an invention?,
todd glassey
- A real-world example of the IETF's screwed up induction process or "Who owns Syslog?" - and why is this important to IPR?,
todd glassey
- Jorge as the IETF's lawyer, does the merging of the two sets of rights defined in the BCP78 document make an exclusive?,
todd glassey
- Re: BCP78's Copyright Statement... may be wrong - all submissions to the IETF are likely exclusive in nature. They have to be!,
todd glassey
- BCP78's Copyright Statement... may be wrong - all submissions to the IETF are likely exclusive in nature. They have to be!,
todd glassey
- Where's the Contract - Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
todd glassey
- RE: Date clarification [Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?],
Contreras, Jorge
- WG Action: RECHARTER: Intellectual Property Rights (ipr),
IESG Secretary
- If there is no exclusive conveyance agreement then who owns the delta between when an idea was submitted as a ID and when it becones a RFC?,
todd glassey
- Here is a PDF timeline showing the 5 states of ownership of the IETF's works...,
todd glassey
- RE: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Contreras, Jorge
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt,
Joel M. Halpern
- ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
todd glassey
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
todd glassey
- exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions.,
todd glassey
- Re: exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions.,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: exclusive vs. non-exlcusive releases... and the requirement for a wet signature on IP submissions.,
todd glassey
- Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
todd glassey
- #1212 Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: #1212 Re: ISSUE? What does the copyright claim in I-D/RFCs mean?,
todd glassey
- Review of draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-00.txt,
Simon Josefsson
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: ADMIN Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementationandderivativework,
todd glassey
- Rule 107 and the US Copyright Code...,
todd glassey
- RE: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation andderivativework,
Contreras, Jorge
- proposed new charter,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Editor for "outgoing rights" document,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- WG Review: Recharter of Intellectual Property Rights (ipr),
IESG Secretary
- #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Fw: #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
todd glassey
- Reminder: Open issues,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
todd glassey
- #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
todd glassey
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
todd glassey
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...,
todd glassey
- Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
todd glassey
- Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Righs in mailing list articles (Re: #1197 Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
Brian E Carpenter
- NOTEWELL IS BROKEN - was Re: Rights in mailing list articles Re: #1197,
todd glassey
- #1198 Implementation = derivative work? (Re: ISSUES How IP is input and Intent...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- ISSUE: outbound license on future RFCs,
Simon Josefsson
- Flawed license in document...,
Simon Josefsson
- My apologies - there is a PDF file attached to this - 27KB - its a license worth looking at.,
todd glassey
- RE: License for the Service Data Objects JavaDoc and Interface Definition files,
Lawrence Rosen
- Fw: DoC Report on New Internet Protocol,
George T. Willingmyre
- How does Torvalds commentary on GPL3 figure into this? - Larry?,
todd glassey
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Proposed updated charter, IPR WG,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Code vs text,
todd . glassey
- issue tracker created for IPR wg,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg,
todd glassey
- Code vs text (was: Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg),
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Code vs text,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Code vs text,
John C Klensin
- Re: Code vs text,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Code vs text,
todd glassey
- RE: Code vs text,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Code vs text,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Code vs text,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Code vs text,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Code vs text,
John C Klensin
- Re: Code vs text,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Code vs text,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Code vs text,
John C Klensin
- Re: Code vs text,
Simon Josefsson
- #1175 Re: Code vs text,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: issue tracker created for IPR wg,
Frank Ellermann
- draft of GPLv3 release,
Steven M. Bellovin
- The Law... Definition of Derivative Claims...,
todd glassey
- FYI - Legal Definition of a Derivative Work - per Copyright,
todd glassey
- Status summary, IPR WG - Jan 17, 2005,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Mail converted by MHonArc
