IPR-WG Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Request for comments on proposed changes to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP),
Marshall Eubanks
- Why is a I-D obsolting a RFC?,
Todd Glassey
- Re: [Nea] IESG query re Expert Review,
Todd Glassey
- Trust decision on new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP) Effective 12 September 2009,
Marshall Eubanks
- Who owns the copyright on the master proof-implementations? (the code used to prove IETF protocols work),
Todd Glassey
- Proposed Policy for Modifications to Trust Legal Provisions (TLP),
Marshall Eubanks
- Copyrights and the IRTF and Independent Stream,
Olaf Kolkman
- [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-5378-old-text-02.txt],
Brian E Carpenter
- PRE8PROB BOF Minutes,
Russ Housley
- Who owns the Internet Rules?,
Lawrence Rosen
- NoteWell use pertains to the IETF Mailing Lists too - but hey - anyone with half a brain should have known that - WAS: Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest",
Todd Glassey CISM CIFI
- 5378 Procedures Fix,
Ray Pelletier
- Re: 5378 Procedures Fix,
Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 5378 Procedures Fix,
John C Klensin
- Re: 5378 Procedures Fix,
Scott Brim
- Re: 5378 Procedures Fix,
TSG
- who has the,problem here, really?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
John C Klensin
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
Marshall Eubanks
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
John C Klensin
- Re: who has the,problem here, really?,
SM
- Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF,
TSG
- Question about the meaning of the following boilerplate statement...,
TSG
- Call for volunteers to discuss IETF patent policy with Richard Stallman,
Noel Chiappa
- International definition of "fair use",
Harald Alvestrand
- not doing required disclosures,
Scott O. Bradner
- WG Action: Conclusion of Intellectual Property Rights (ipr),
IESG Secretary
- Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF,
Ed Juskevicius
- [Fwd: RFC 5377 on Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to Be Granted in IETF Documents],
Harald Alvestrand
- Congratulations on the publication of RFCs 5377 and 5378,
Russ Housley
- BCP 78, RFC 5378 on Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust,
rfc-editor
- RFC 5377 on Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to Be Granted in IETF Documents,
rfc-editor
- somewhat orthogonal post - Question about Internet Services and SLA's - and the IETF's blanket license.,
TS Glassey
- IETF Trust Decision on "Legal Provisions for IETF Documents" (dated October 16, 2008),
Ed Juskevicius
- placing a dollar value on IETF IP.,
TS Glassey
- The IETF policy needs to be expanded for two types of IPR Declarations.,
TS Glassey
- The IPR page functionality needcs help.,
TS Glassey
- Problem with the confidentiality section of BCP78 - the language obligates the IETF to be able to retract something.,
TS Glassey
- Proposed change to Granting of Rights Section of PCB78,
TS Glassey
- RE: Last Call for comments on "IETF Trust Legal Provisions" (dated09-19-08),
Contreras, Jorge
- Last Call for comments on "IETF Trust Legal Provisions" (dated 09-19-08),
Ed Juskevicius
- Protocol Action: 'Rights Contributors provide to the IETF Trust' to BCP,
The IESG
- RE: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: IETF copying conditions,
Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: IETF copying conditions,
Ted Hardie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Ted Hardie
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
TS Glassey
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Ted Hardie
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Contreras, Jorge
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
TS Glassey
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Paul Hoffman
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Black_David
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Ian Jackson
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Ted Hardie
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
TS Glassey
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Ted Hardie
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions,
Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF copying conditions,
Simon Josefsson
- Proposed BCP78 Language Changes,
TS Glassey
- Mr. Glassey's recent postings,
Stephan Wenger
- New Topic: US Law/Precedent on Spoliation of Data,
TS Glassey
- End of suspension period for Todd Glassey,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.,
Scott Brim
- RE: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS andother filings.,
Contreras, Jorge
Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents",
Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents",
Simon Josefsson
- RE: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal ProvisionsRelated to IETFDocuments",
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Relatedto IETFDocuments",
TS Glassey
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments",
Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents",
Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents",
Ray Pelletier
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents",
Bill Fenner
IPR Minutes from IETF 72,
Harald Alvestrand
Suspension Processes require Notice when a Suspension is Lifted.,
TS Glassey
Boilerplate text,
Bill Fenner
oops,
Scott O. Bradner
email quoting,
Scott O. Bradner
mirroring IDs,
Scott O. Bradner
Issues with the IETF Trust license text,
Harald Alvestrand
ADMIN: Suspension of posting rights for Todd Glassey,
Harald Alvestrand
Fw: global standards and patents (iusmentis.com),
TS Glassey
Re: Jorge - Answer these questions -,
TS Glassey
Re: Jorge - Answer these question - or face litigation and the ethicscommittee of your licensing bar assoc's,
TS Glassey
Re: Jorge - Answer these question - or face litigation and the ethicscommittee of your licensing bar assoc's,
John C Klensin
Jorge - Answer these question - or face litigation and the ethics committee of your licensing bar assoc's,
TS Glassey
Observation about IPR impact on IETF license.,
TS Glassey
Flaw in IPR Setup and IETF BCP78 with regard to IPR's,
TS Glassey
Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents,
Ray Pelletier
Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areas from being developed...,
TS Glassey
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areas from being developed...,
Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrom being developed...,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrom being developed...,
TS Glassey
- RE: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrom being developed...,
Lawrence Rosen
- Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or US Patent Filings?,
TS Glassey
- Re: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or US Patent Filings?,
C.T. Aiken
- Re: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or US Patent Filings?,
TS Glassey
- RE: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or US Patent Filings?,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or USPatent Filings?,
TS Glassey
- RE: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or USPatent Filings?,
Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Was: Re: Question - Is: Can IETF filings affect Japan or USPatent Filings?,
TS Glassey
- RE: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
- RE: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stopareasfrombeing developed...,
Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stopareasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
C.T. Aiken
- Message not available
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
C.T. Aiken
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areasfrombeing developed...,
TS Glassey
- Re: Question about why bother- If IPR Notices cannot stop areas from being developed...,
TS Glassey
Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents: authors,
Contreras, Jorge
I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Agenda, Dublin IPR WG meeting,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
TS Glassey
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Ed Juskevicius
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Endre Jarraux Walls
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Lawrence Rosen
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents: Extracts,
Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents: Extracts,
TS Glassey
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents: Extracts,
Contreras, Jorge
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents: Extracts,
TS Glassey
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
TS Glassey
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Simon Josefsson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents,
Ray Pelletier
[Fwd: IPR - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 72],
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
New Item - BCP79 Also applies to IESG Staff Member's,
TS Glassey
Question? - why are IPR filing's necessary?,
TS Glassey
Valuing IETF efforts in Submissions and NoteWell work.,
TS Glassey
Harald - you assked for another legal opinion - meet Cynthia Stamer Esq... Fw: Interesting article on HR Litigation over personal opinion posts on the Internet,
TS Glassey
in re "Cisco Sued over Blogger's Posts",
TS Glassey
Meeting scheduled for Dublin,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
IETF Sublicense prevent's the recall of IP published...,
TS Glassey
Who is responsible when IETF IP work violates patent rights?,
TS Glassey
The IPR filing process needs PRIORITY,
TS Glassey
IPR Page flaws...,
TSG
What happens to IETF efforts when the IPR-Filing says "NO The IETF cannot have this IP"?,
TSG
Flaw in NoteWell,
TSG
IP Discolsure #201,
TSG
IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Russ Housley
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
TS Glassey
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Russ Housley
- Message not available
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
TS Glassey
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Russ Housley
- Message not available
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
TS Glassey
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Russ Housley
- Message not available
- Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
TS Glassey
Message not availableRe: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Cullen Jennings
Re: IESG evaluation of our documents, current version,
Russ Housley
I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-09.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Addressing concerns with -incoming and the streams definition,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
IPR WG Documents Completed Last Call,
Russ Housley
Now this is an ipr license I like..,
Pekka Savola
Question about IPR declaration - What can a I-D be used for?,
TS Glassey
Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments,
Peter Saint-Andre
Last Call: draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming (Rights Contributors provide to the IETF Trust) to BCP,
The IESG
New versions of IPR drafts,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Last Call: draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights (Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to be Granted in IETF Documents) to Informational RFC,
The IESG
I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
IPR WG Rules MAY NOT VIOTALE THE Code of Conduct of the ISOC,
todd glassey
The ISOC Code of Conduct is the overriding document here.,
todd glassey
[no subject],
TS Glassey
Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
todd glassey
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Russ Housley
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
todd glassey
- OT: Expo (was: Request for advancement of IPR documents),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
TS Glassey
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
TS Glassey
- RE: Request for advancement of IPR documents,
Black_David
Request for legal review of IPR documents,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
ABA book on rules fro standards orgs,
Scott O. Bradner
I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Question about notifying the IETF of litigation - re the SSL litigation against Wachovia,
TS Glassey
ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder,
mailman-owner
Notification of NOT holding a meeting in Philadelphia,
Harald Alvestrand
Response to appeal from Todd Glassey dated 26-Nov-2007,
IESG Secretary
New item: What happens when an Initiative is started under RFC2026 rules and is updated?,
todd glassey
If I-D's are only published for six months then what is the retention period on them?,
todd glassey
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Response to appeal from Dean Anderson dated 26-Dec-2007,
IESG Secretary
Re: Vote on tls-authz??? (fwd),
TS Glassey
Mail converted by MHonArc
