[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Ips] Protocol Action: 'Declarative Public Extension Key for iSCSI Node Architecture' to Proposed Standard
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Declarative Public Extension Key for iSCSI Node Architecture '
<draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IP Storage Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Lars Eggert and Magnus Westerlund.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-03.txt
Technical Summary
The iSCSI protocol, described in RFC 3720, allows for extension
items to the protocol in the form of Private or Public Extension
Keys. This Internet-Draft describes a Public Extension Key for the
purpose of enhancing iSCSI supportability. The key accomplishes this
objective by allowing iSCSI nodes to communicate architecture details
during the iSCSI login sequence. The receiving node can then use
this information for enhanced logging and support.
Working Group Summary
This document was carefully reviewed in the WG primarily for security
concerns (protecting sensitive information about what is running) and
the possible abuse of this key in a fashion similar to theabuse of
the HTTP "Server" and "User-Agent" fields that can damage
interoperability. As a result of this WG attention, the draft
contains specific text to address both concerns.
Protocol Quality
There are implementations of functionality similar to that provided
by this key.
This draft was reviewed for the IPS WG by David L. Black., who also
acted as PROTO Document Shepherd.
Lars Eggert reviewed this document for the IESG.
Note to RFC Editor
Section 3, paragraph 2
OLD:
Nodes implementing this key MAY choose to only transmit the key, only
log the key values received from other nodes, or both transmit and
log the key values.
NEW:
Nodes implementing this key MUST choose one of the following
implementation options:
o only transmit the key
o only log the key values received from other nodes or
o both transmit and log the key values.
Section 3, paragraph 3
OLD:
Thus, a valid implementation of this key may be that a node is
completely silent
NEW:
Thus, a valid behavior for this key may be that a node is
completely silent
In Section 5 IANA Considerations, insert the following
text after the first paragraph:
NEW:
The update to RFC 3720 to allow additional types of RFCs for
iSCSI Extension items has the same effect as if the following
changes were made to the text of RFC 3720 (RFC text cannot be
changed after publication):
1) In Section 11.1, the requirement that Z# Authentication methods
"MUST be described by an informational RFC." is changed to
"MUST be described by a standards track RFC, an experimental
RFC or an informational RFC."
2) In Section 12.1, the requirement that Y# Digest algorithms
"MUST be described by an informational RFC." is changed to
"MUST be described by a standards track RFC, an experimental
RFC or an informational RFC."
3) In Section 12.22, the requirement that X# text keys
"MUST be described by an informational RFC." is changed to
"MUST be described by a standards track RFC, an experimental
RFC or an informational RFC."
4) In Section 13.3, the description of allowed RFC types for
extension items is changed from "The RFC may be informational
rather than Standards-Track," to "The RFC MUST be standards
track, experimental or informational,"
5) In Section 13.5.2, the phrase "standards track" is changed to
"standards track or experimental" in the last sentence of
the first paragraph, so that the sentence reads: "If the
specification is a standards track or experimental document,
the usual IETF procedures for such documents are followed."
The registries for iSCSI extension items should be managed as
if these changes had been made to the text of RFC 3720.
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips