[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ips] iSCSI naming conventions

To: ips <ips at ietf.org>
Subject: [Ips] iSCSI naming conventions
From: "Vishal Study" <vishal.study at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:28:20 -0800
Cc:
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VRbqDoyfSvTANBlui7epMRgaT0ADbYSO5FultA//wkfJyWqVuPWRpVxhiagErBGcJxMloeIKoGeipdHx3cDLNeuGlpt3UyV4/3XP6e1DxA4/A8y4PlOgVjaThIpazLaGo98wusNukE49Xsmywc8PQsFYZHBfLRQZiHniSi/w6aA=
List-help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi:

I understand that there are two types of naming conventions in iSCSI:
IQN and EUI.

Could someone please help me with following questions:
- Should a iSCSI device (target/initiator) support both or just one?
- Which naming convention is more common and popular?
- Can an IQN-based initiator talk to EUI-based target and vice-versa?

Thanks in advance for your help,
Vishal.

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Ips] iSCSI naming conventions
  - From: Sandars, Ken

Prev by Date: RE: [Ips] Device Identification VPD Page for iSCSI Targets
Next by Date: RE: [Ips] iSCSI naming conventions
Previous by thread: [Ips] Protocol Action: 'Declarative Public Extension Key for iSCSI Node Architecture' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: RE: [Ips] iSCSI naming conventions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread