Thanks,
--David
From: Pat Thaler [mailto:pthaler at broadcom.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Black, David; arkady.kanevsky at gmail.com
Cc: imss at ietf.org; ips at ietf.org; rddp at ietf.org; storm at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 versionDid you mean "are not based on TCP" rather than "are not based on IP"?Arkady was asking about connection setup for SCTP which the former fits but not the latter.Regards,Pat
From: ips-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David at emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Black_David at emc.com; arkady.kanevsky at gmail.com
Cc: imss at ietf.org; ips at ietf.org; storm at ietf.org; rddp at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 versionAnd here's what I just did to that bullet ...
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.
I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...Thanks,
--David
From: rddp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David at emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky at gmail.com
Cc: imss at ietf.org; ips at ietf.org; rddp at ietf.org; storm at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 versionArkady,I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with thatdegree of specifics. Thanks for pointing this out,and I apologize for the delay in responding.Thanks,
--David
David,
From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm at ietf.org; imss at ietf.org; ips at ietf.org; rddp at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 versionThe description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a smallupdate to MPA startup functionality to allow either endof the connection to initiate.This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part ofconnection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPAspec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provideRDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message basedprotocol.How about:(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a smallupdate to MPA startup functionality to allow either endof the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP ConnectionSetup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message basedprotocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.Thanks,Arkady
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David at emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access. This is
about to go out for wider review.
Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon. If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm at ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp at ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm at ietf.org mailing list.
Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david at emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky