Christian.Kaas-Petersen at tietoenator.com writes:
> 3GPP has in document TS 24.302 (can be retrieved from
>
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24302.htm), section 7.2.2,
> specified a use of IKE, where IKE sets up a secure tunnel to
> a security gateway, denoted ePDG, and expects this security gateway
> to return both an address to the mobile node, which normally
> will be a care-of address, and the address(es) of the home agent.
> The said document thinks this possible by having two Configuration
> Payloads. IKEv2bis, and previous documents, only indicated one
> Configuration Payload to be present, and with the recent discussion
> in mind where the order of the payloads in an IKE packet should
> not matter, then having two Configuration Payloads is not a viable
> approach. It would be better to introduce two new configuration
> attributes, for example named INTERNAL_IP4_HA and INTERNAL_IP6_HA.
Yes, it would be better to have 2 new configuration options. The