Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format

To: "Grewal, Ken" <ken.grewal at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen at iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:15:32 +0200
Cc: "ipsec at ietf.org" <ipsec at ietf.org>, Paul Koning <Paul_Koning at dell.com>, "ynir at checkpoint.com" <ynir at checkpoint.com>
Delivered-to: ipsec at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <C49B4B6450D9AA48AB99694D2EB0A4830CDF2C90 at rrsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8D97E66FC7A at il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <18826.55660.517420.835024 at fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <9FB7C7CE79B84449B52622B506C78036130846B87F at il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <18827.4652.53691.761109 at gargle.gargle.HOWL> <C49B4B6450D9AA48AB99694D2EB0A4830CDF2C90 at rrsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>

Grewal, Ken writes:
> If there are alternatives that would allow operation over 'well
> known' ports such as 80, then those would be preferable. 

As most of those voice systems do use UDP, even using well known port
80 does not help as it is only open for TCP traffic. Running voice
over tcp gets quite poor results, especially if your connection might
drop few packets. 
-- 
kivinen at iki.fi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Jean-Michel Combes

References:
- [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Yaron Sheffer
- [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Yoav Nir
- Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
  - From: Grewal, Ken

Prev by Date: Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
Next by Date: Re: [IPsec] draft-kivinen-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics comments
Previous by thread: Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
Next by thread: Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.