Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2

To: "Frankel, Sheila E." <sheila.frankel at nist.gov>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen at iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:12:14 +0200
Cc: "ipsec at ietf.org" <ipsec at ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>, "suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com" <suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com>
Delivered-to: ipsec at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930789878B76 at MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <063.06d317c6f664560309ce0afcacc220bc at tools.ietf.org> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930789878B76 at MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>

Frankel, Sheila E. writes:
> 
> #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2
> 
> Proposed changes to Roadmap doc:
> 
> 1) Change IKEv2 requirement level for Camellia-CBC from undefined (no RFC) 
> 		to optional
> 
> 2) Add text to Section 5.2.6 (RFC 4312, The Camellia Cipher Algorithm and Its Use with IPsec)

Looks ok for me.
-- 
kivinen at iki.fi

References:
- Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2
  - From: Frankel, Sheila E.

Prev by Date: Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #114: Expired drafts, especially BEET
Next by Date: [IPsec] Proposed agenda
Previous by thread: Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2
Next by thread: [IPsec] Proposed agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #115: Camellia req levels for IKEv2

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.