[IPsec] On the WG not moving draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey to the IETF
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 27 April 2013 16:39 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709821F9739 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ryg3Op8KD-kB for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7021F972C for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3RGd753075611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:39:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DD83A21-6C8A-4EAC-A2E3-B8DE094A46E0@vpnc.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:39:08 -0700
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [IPsec] On the WG not moving draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey to the IETF
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:39:09 -0000
There was not enough support for draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey for us to say that there is WG consensus on the document. Only three people even commented: Michael Richardson, Yang Cui, and Tony Putman. The document authors (who did a lot of hard work) should strongly consider resubmitting the document again using a non-WG file name and taking it to the Security Area Directors as an individual submission. I believe that it should become a standard, despite with the barely-visible support of this WG. --Paul Hoffman
- [IPsec] On the WG not moving draft-ietf-ipsecme-o… Paul Hoffman