IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Nov 21 2003
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Ralph Droms
• RE: Address config (was: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text), john . loughney
• Re: Address config (was: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text), Tim Chown
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), john . loughney
• Address config (was: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text), john . loughney
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), john . loughney
• RE: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• Isn't there any link to refer slides, Soohong Daniel Park
• Re: [imss] Re: Reminder: IMSS Working Group last call on IPv6 over Fibre Channel Draft Ends Monday Nov 24, Chirayu Patel
• names for non-global addresses, Keith Moore
• Re: Local addresses and security? (was: SL deprecation draft), Andrew White
• Nov 20 2003
• Re: [imss] Re: Reminder: IMSS Working Group last call on IPv6 over Fibre Channel Draft Ends Monday Nov 24, Claudio DeSanti
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Tim Chown
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Tim Chown
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Fred Templin
• Re: Reminder: IMSS Working Group last call on IPv6 over Fibre ChannelDraft Ends Monday Nov 24, Fred Templin
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2013-update-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Margaret . Wasserman
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Bob Hinden
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Margaret . Wasserman
• Reminder: IMSS Working Group last call on IPv6 over Fibre Channel Draft Ends Monday Nov 24, Elizabeth Rodriguez
• Mailman unsubscribe FAQ (Was: How do I unsubscribe? Have tried lots of possibillities but no success. Please help!), Jeroen Massar
• Re: How do I unsubscribe? Have tried lots of possibillities but no success. Please help!, Chirag H. Shroff
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Ralph Droms
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Ralph Droms
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Tim Chown
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Pekka Savola
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Soliman Hesham
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Ralph Droms
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Soliman Hesham
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Ralph Droms
• Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Mailman unsubscribe FAQ (Was: unsubscribe), Jeroen Massar
• unsubscribe, Claudio Lori
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Claudio Lori
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jean-Jacques Pansiot
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jari Arkko
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Brian Haberman
• How do I unsubscribe? Have tried lots of possibillities but no success. Please help!, Dag Veierod
• Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails), john . loughney
• RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text, john . loughney
• RE: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• RE: Node Req. Issue 28: Security Considerations, john . loughney
• Issue 30: MLDv1 vs MLDv2 text, john . loughney
• RE: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• Nov 19 2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-site-local-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jari Arkko
• Re: Node Req. Issue 28: Security Considerations, Jari Arkko
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Fred Templin
• Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Pekka Savola
• Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Fred Templin
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jean-Jacques Pansiot
• Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03 comments, Fred Templin
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jari Arkko
• Re: Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Thomas Narten
• RE: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• Re: Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, Jari Arkko
• Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Eddie Kohler
• Re: Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Jari Arkko
• Node Req. Issue 28: Security Considerations, john . loughney
• Issue 29: AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• AD REVIEW: IPv6 Node Requirements, john . loughney
• RE: Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, john . loughney
• Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Thomas Narten
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Tim Chown
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Leif Johansson
• Re: SL deprecation draft, EricLKlein
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Margaret . Wasserman
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Eddie Kohler
• Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03 comments, Pekka Savola
• Re: SL deprecation draft, EricLKlein
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Fred Templin
• Nov 18 2003
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Fred Templin
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Bob Hinden
• Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Phelan, Tom
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Christian Huitema
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Sellers, Julian P
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), EricLKlein
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Stig Venaas
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Tim Chown
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Brian Haberman
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Tim Chown
• Re: IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Pekka Savola
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Michael Welzl
• Re: SL deprecation draft, EricLKlein
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Eddie Kohler
• IPv4 compatible deprecation? (addr-arch-v4), Tim Chown
• Re: SL deprecation draft, EricLKlein
• Re: Implementing DNS client for support IPv6/IPv4, Mark . Andrews
• RE: Implementing DNS client for support IPv6/IPv4, sasson, shuki
• Re: Implementing DNS client for support IPv6/IPv4, Suresh Satapati
• Nov 17 2003
• Comments on Address Selection API draft ?, Samita Chakrabarti
• Re: Implementing DNS client for support IPv6/IPv4, Niels Möller
• Implementing DNS client for support IPv6/IPv4, sasson, shuki
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Fred Templin
• Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03 comments, Fred Templin
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: SL deprecation draft, EricLKlein
• Re: comments on unman-scenarios-03, Chirayu Patel
• Nov 16 2003
• Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Leif Johansson
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Leif Johansson
• comments on unman-scenarios-03, Chirayu Patel
• Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
• Nov 15 2003
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Eddie Kohler
• draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03 comments, Pekka Savola
• Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues, Fred Templin
• Nov 14 2003
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Zefram
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
• [Fwd: Re: [pmtud] Re: [dccp] PMTU issues], Fred Templin
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tim Chown
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Bob Hinden
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Tim Chown
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Brian E Carpenter
• comment on RFC3542, Nicholas Carbone
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Tim Chown
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Pekka Savola
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Leif Johansson
• Nov 13 2003
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Bob Hinden
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: SL deprecation draft, Christian Huitema
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: comments on thaler-ndproxy-01, Pekka Savola
• Re: SL deprecation draft, Tim Chown
• SL deprecation draft, Alain Durand
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Chirayu Patel
• Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Keith Moore
• Re: Question regarding RFC 2461, Roy Brabson
• Re: Question regarding RFC 2461, Gregory Daley
• RE: ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Christian Huitema
• ISATAP and proto-41 in unmanaged networks?, mariana . nikolova
• Re: ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Bob Hinden
• Question regarding RFC 2461, Lori Napoli
• Re: ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Fred Templin
• Re: ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Fred Templin
• ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Fred Templin
• Re: ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, itojun
• ISATAP in unmanaged networks?, Fred Templin
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Pekka Savola
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Chirayu Patel
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Christian Huitema
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, john . loughney
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Thomas Narten
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Thomas Narten
• Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Andrew White
• Nov 12 2003
• RE: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, john . loughney
• Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Keith Moore
• RE: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, john . loughney
• Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Keith Moore
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, john . loughney
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Brian Haberman
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Christian Huitema
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Christian Huitema
• FWD: IAB Response to your appeal of October 9, 2003, Thomas Narten
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Sending text, Erik Nordmark
• Re: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Pekka Savola
• RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, john . loughney
• RE: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, john . loughney
• RFC2461 update and M/O flags., Gregory Daley
• Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Christian Huitema
• comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt, Keith Moore
• Re: Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt), Fred Templin
• Re: Comments about draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange, Keith Moore
• Re: Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt), Fred Templin
• Re: Comments about draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange, Fred Templin
• myth: IETF cannot tell people how to run their networks, Keith Moore
• Comments about draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange, Tony Hain
• Nov 11 2003
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• RE: comments on thaler-ndproxy-01, Dave Thaler
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Christian Huitema
• RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt, Fred Templin
• RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt, Pekka Savola
• Re: Sites in draft "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tim Chown
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Zefram
• Sites in draft "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", NOISETTE Yoann FTRD/DMI/CAE
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt), Fred Templin
• [no subject], Unknown
• RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt, Erik Nordmark
• Re: comments on thaler-ndproxy-01, Chirayu Patel
• Re: anycast-analysis draft, itojun
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, Atsushi Onoe
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, Pekka Savola
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Chirayu Patel
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Mark Smith
• test, Nicholas Carbone
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", matthew . ford
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tim Chown
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Mark Smith
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Mark Smith
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Hans Kruse
• Nov 10 2003
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bob Hinden
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Mark Smith
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Stephen Sprunk
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Stephen Sprunk
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Hans Kruse
• Re: Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt), Fred Templin
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: anycast-analysis draft, Erik Nordmark
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Stephen Sprunk
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Stephen Sprunk
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bob Hinden
• Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt), Fred Templin
• Re: RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, Gregory Daley
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Geoff Huston
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Elwyn Davies
• Re: A list of issues for RFC2462 update, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt, Fred Templin
• Nov 09 2003
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Bob Hinden
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Leif Johansson
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Tim Chown
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bob Hinden
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Pekka Savola
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Leif Johansson
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bound, Jim
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: anycast-analysis draft, itojun
• RE: anycast-analysis draft, john . loughney
• anycast-analysis draft, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Pekka Savola
• comments on thaler-ndproxy-01, Pekka Savola
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tim Chown
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
• Re: the real issue (was Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options- resolution), Vijay Devarapalli
• RE: the real issue (was Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution), Bound, Jim
• Nov 08 2003
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• Re: the real issue (was Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options -resolution), Pekka Savola
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• Nov 07 2003
• SUMMARY: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• the real issue (was Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution), Vijay Devarapalli
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Bound, Jim
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Bound, Jim
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Latest Agenda, Brian Haberman
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• WiMAX Summit, M Winkhler
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Bound, Jim
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Markku Savela
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, Bound, Jim
• Nov 06 2003
• Re: Scribes Needed, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, Greg Daley
• Re: Clash of IPv6 and Multi6 WG meetings, Tim Chown
• Re: Clash of IPv6 and Multi6 WG meetings, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, Bound, Jim
• RE: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Bound, Jim
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Bound, Jim
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Christian Huitema
• RE: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Bound, Jim
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Pekka Savola
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Pekka Savola
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-01.txt, Zefram
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - summary, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Greg Daley
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Eliot Lear
• Nov 05 2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-01.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Niels Möller
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Christian Huitema
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Raul Echeberria
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Tim Hartrick
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Hans Kruse
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Tim Chown
• RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Tim Chown
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Tim Chown
• Author list for 2461bis and 2462bis, Brian Haberman
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian Haberman
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Niels Möller
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Benny Amorsen
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Markku Savela
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Niels Möller
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Erik Nordmark
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Greg Daley
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Pekka Savola
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Pekka Savola
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• RE: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Christian Huitema
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Greg Daley
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Greg Daley
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Thomas Narten
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Thomas Narten
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Keith Moore
• Nov 04 2003
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Niels Möller
• RE: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Eugene M. Kim
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Eugene M. Kim
• Extenstions to IPv6 Socket API for Mobile IP, Samita Chakrabarti
• Address Selection API draft, Samita Chakrabarti
• REVISED Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• REVISED Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Re: DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals andAI_ADDRCONFIG), Keith Moore
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Tim Hartrick
• DNS lookup API (was Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG), Eugene M. Kim
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• Last Call: 'IP Forwarding Table MIB' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Tim Chown
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Tim Chown
• RE: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Christian Huitema
• RE: [Mip6] Re: A list of issues for RFC2462 update, Ed Remmell
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Tim Hartrick
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Keith Moore
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Pekka Savola
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Erik Nordmark
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Pekka Savola
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, JinHyeock Choi
• RE: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Pekka Savola
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Markku Savela
• Re: Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Mohacsi Janos
• Issue 13: Omission of prefix options - resolution, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Tim Chown
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Tim Chown
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Tim Chown
• RE: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, Soliman Hesham
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Alain Durand
• RE: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Bound, Jim
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, JinHyeock Choi
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Jari Arkko
• RE: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, Soliman Hesham
• draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-02.txt issues list, Dave Thaler
• Re: [Mip6] Re: A list of issues for RFC2462 update, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 UnicastAddresses", Geoff Huston
• Re: A list of issues for RFC2462 update, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• RE: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list, Greg Daley
• Re: implementation reports for rfc246[01]bis (Re: RFC 2461- issue list), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• RE: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Christian Huitema
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Re: implementation reports for rfc246[01]bis (Re: RFC 2461- issuelist), Fred Templin
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Nov 03 2003
• implementation reports for rfc246[01]bis (Re: RFC 2461- issue list), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Colm MacCarthaigh
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Fred Templin
• Re: Subnetting question, Suresh Krishnan
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Keith Moore
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Pekka Savola
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, Fred Templin
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, James Kempf
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Colm MacCarthaigh
• Re: Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Erik Nordmark
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Keith Moore
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Stig Venaas
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Keith Moore
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, JinHyeock Choi
• RE: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, Soliman Hesham
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list: Prefixes with L=0, JinHyeock Choi
• Subnetting question, Mario Goebbels
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt, Brian Haberman
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, Pekka Savola
• Re: WGLC comments about scoping-arch, Markku Savela
• WGLC comments about scoping-arch, Pekka Savola
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• IMSS: Working Group last call on IPv6 over Fibre Channel Draft, elizabeth . rodriguez
• Nov 01 2003
• Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462, Bound, Jim
• Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
• Nov 01 2003
• Thoughts on the draft-hinden last call, Hans Kruse
• Oct 31 2003
• Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Latest Agenda, Brian Haberman
• Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 UnicastAddresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list, Greg Daley
• RE: RFC 2461- issue list, Soliman Hesham
• Oct 30 2003
• Re: RFC 2461- issue list, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (was Re: "RFC 2461bis"issue: MTU handling), Fred Templin
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Pekka Savola
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Sebastien Roy
• INFO: FW: Implementation vs. the Standard, Bound, Jim
• Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (was Re: "RFC 2461bis"issue: MTU handling), Mark Smith
• RE: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Scribes Needed, Brian Haberman
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• RE: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• RE: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Tony Hain
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian Huitema
• Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Fred Templin
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Geoff Huston
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• RE: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham
• Oct 29 2003
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: RFC 2460 issue, Fred Templin
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• RE: RFC 2460 issue, Bound, Jim
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Keith Moore
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Alain Durand
• Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Fred Templin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-08.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-08.txt, Matt Crawford
• Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Erik Nordmark
• RE : RFC 2460 issue, KASSI-LAHLOU Mohammed FTRD/DMI/CAE
• Re: RFC 2460 issue, Suresh Krishnan
• RE: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
• RE: Review: draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt, Bound, Jim
• Re: MTU handling and 2461bis, Tim Hartrick
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, itojun
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, itojun
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Stig Venaas
• Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• RE: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Pekka Savola
• RE: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG, Tony Hain
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Tony Hain
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Sebastien Roy
• Re: MTU handling and 2461bis, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Jari Arkko
• RE: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Keith Moore
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Keith Moore
• RE: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Sebastien Roy
• Re: Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Keith Moore
• Issue 3: on link assumption considered harmful, Soliman Hesham