IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Oct 23 2003

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-bykim-ipv6-hpd-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
I-D ACTION:draft-bykim-ipv6-hpd-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
RE: RFC 2461- issue list, Soliman Hesham
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Pekka Savola
New Mobile Technologies Forum, Peter Lewis
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Erik Nordmark
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Ralph Droms
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Pekka Savola
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Pekka Savola
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Tim Chown
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Ronald van der Pol
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Jaehoon Jeong
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Erik Nordmark
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Alain Durand
Re: RFC 2461- issue list, Erik Nordmark
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Geoff Huston
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Pekka Savola
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Tim Chown
RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Soohong Daniel Park
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
"RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Soohong Daniel Park
RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Soohong Daniel Park
RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Soliman Hesham
"RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Pekka Savola
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.tGoxt, Bound, Jim
RFC 2461- issue list, Soliman Hesham
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Myung-Ki Shin
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Myung-Ki Shin
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Soliman Hesham
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Soliman Hesham
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Fred Templin

Oct 22 2003

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Soohong Daniel Park
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Barany, Pete
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Fred Templin
I-D ACTION:draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Keith Moore
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Erik Nordmark
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Erik Nordmark
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Iljitsch van Beijnum
New IMSS WG; IPv6 over Fibre Channel Draft, elizabeth . rodriguez
Re: A host who has private IPv4 address can communicate with IPv6 host globaly by 6to4 tunnel, Tim Chown
Re: A host who has private IPv4 address can communicate with IPv6 host globaly by 6to4 tunnel, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Erik Nordmark
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Pekka Savola
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Pekka Savola
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Zefram
RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Erik Nordmark
IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian Haberman
RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", jspark
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture", Brian Haberman
IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
Re: A host who has private IPv4 address can communicate with IPv6 host globaly by 6to4 tunnel, Tim Chown
A host who has private IPv4 address can communicate with IPv6 host globaly by 6to4 tunnel, Jisuek.Lim
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Erik Nordmark
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ

Oct 21 2003

IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses", Bob Hinden
Request to Advance "MIB for the Transmission Control Protocol", Bob Hinden
I-D ACTION:draft-syam-ipv6-state-model-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
I-D ACTION:draft-jinchoi-ipv6-cra-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
dubious premises: batch reply to "IPv6 adoption behavior", Keith Moore
RE: Comments: draft-savola-v6ops-transarch-01.txt, Bound, Jim
Discussion on "IPv6 adoption behavior", Bob Hinden
Comments: draft-savola-v6ops-transarch-01.txt, Bound, Jim
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Bound, Jim
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Suresh Krishnan
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Tim Chown
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Stig Venaas
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Suresh Krishnan
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Tim Chown
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Jeroen Massar
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Ralph Droms
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Suresh Krishnan
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Suresh Krishnan
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Jeroen Massar
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Jeroen Massar
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Benny Amorsen
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Todd T. Fries
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Benny Amorsen
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-thaler-inet-tunnel-mib-00.txt, Pekka Savola
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Måns Nilsson
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Eugene M. Kim
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Christian Huitema
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py

Oct 20 2003

Re: Response to IESG comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-07.txt, Bob Hinden
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
[no subject], Unknown
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Eugene M. Kim
Link Local address : Basic question, Guru Yeleswarapu
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, EricLKlein
Re: Raise the bar for v6?, Ronald van der Pol
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Jeroen Massar
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Bound, Jim

Oct 18 2003

Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Oct 18 2003

Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Oct 17 2003

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Sellers, Julian P
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Question on RFC 2473 about Tunnel Encapsulation Limit, Srinivasan Narasimhan
A list of issues for RFC2462 update, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Bob Hinden
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Suresh Krishnan
Comments on RA issues for MD, JinHyeock Choi

Oct 16 2003

RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Tony Hain
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Geoff Huston
RFC2461 update, Soliman Hesham
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Brian E Carpenter
RFC2462 update, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: Unicast and multicast site-local addresses, Andrew White
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Tony Hain
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-thaler-inet-tunnel-mib-00.txt, Dave Thaler

Oct 15 2003

Re: Unicast and multicast site-local addresses, Brian Haberman
Unicast and multicast site-local addresses, Barany, Pete
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Mohsen Souissi
Re: stealth v6 DNS, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Brian Haberman
RE: stealth v6 DNS, Jeroen Massar
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Jeroen Massar
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Bound, Jim
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Bound, Jim
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, John Gregson
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Mohsen Souissi
Re: stealth v6 DNS, Bill Manning
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Soohong Daniel Park
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Måns Nilsson
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Pekka Savola
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Måns Nilsson
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Jeroen Massar
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
[Announce] RA issues for MD/ DNA I-D, JinHyeock Choi
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
just test... please ignore this, Youn-Hee Han
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani

Oct 14 2003

Test ... please ignore, Barany, Peter
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Keith Moore
Re: Removing features, Leif Johansson
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Dan Lanciani
Re: Removing features, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: IPv6 adoption behavior, Geoff Huston
RE: IPv6 adoption behavior, Michel Py
IPv6 adoption behavior, Fred Baker
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Carlos Friacas
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Fred Baker
RE: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Michel Py
Re: Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Mans Nilsson
RE: Response to IESG comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-07.txt, Soliman Hesham
Will IPv4 be formally deprecated when IPv6 is good enough ?, Mark Smith
Response to IESG comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-07.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Raise the bar for v6?, Bill Manning
Raise the bar for v6?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Removing features, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
RE: Removing features, Jeroen Massar
Re: Removing features, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Bound, Jim

Oct 13 2003

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-site-local-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: Removing features, Mans Nilsson
Re: Removing features, Mans Nilsson
RE: Removing features, Jeroen Massar
Re: Removing features, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Removing features, Brian E Carpenter

Oct 11 2003

Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Oct 11 2003

Re: Removing features, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Removing features, Michel Py
Re: Removing features, Leif Johansson
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Leif Johansson
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Leif Johansson
Re: Removing features, Rob Austein

Oct 10 2003

Re: Removing features, Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: Removing features, Fred Baker
Re: Removing features, Keith Moore
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Fred Baker
RE: Removing features, Margaret . Wasserman
Re: Removing features, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Removing features, Fred Baker
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Keith Moore
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Eliot Lear
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Removing features, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Keith Moore
Re: Removing features, Keith Moore
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Leif Johansson
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Scott Bradner
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Eugene M. Kim
RE: Removing features, Margaret . Wasserman
Removing features, Fred Baker
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Tony Hain
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Tony Hain
Re: state-of-art SLs, Unknown
re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Scott Bradner
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Thomas Narten
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Margaret . Wasserman
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Keith Moore
Updated text for Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, john . loughney
An official HIP BOF request has been sent, Pekka Nikander
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Michel Py
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Christian Huitema
RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Michel Py
Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
test, Mukesh . Gupta
Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue, Tony Hain

Oct 09 2003

Re: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Bob Hinden
RE: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Michel Py
Re: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Bill Manning
Fwd: RE: Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Chirayu Patel
RE: Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, john . loughney
unsubscribe, Srinivasa Rao Nalluri
unsubscribe, VO Tien Cuong FTRD/DAC/ISS
Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue", Leif Johansson

Oct 08 2003

RE: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Michel Py
Re: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Brian Haberman
What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, EricLKlein
2nd Call for Agenda Items, Brian Haberman
Re: comments on address selection API, Samita Chakrabarti
Re: comments on address selection API, Samita Chakrabarti

Oct 07 2003

Reminder: Internet-Draft cutoff dates for Minneapolis IETF, Bob Hinden
Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue", Margaret . Wasserman

Oct 04 2003

Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Oct 03 2003

Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Fred Templin
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Dan Lanciani
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Fred Templin

Oct 01 2003

Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, john . loughney
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Brian Haberman
ndproxy-00 (new text + reorganization), Chirayu Patel
ndproxy-00 (new text + reorganization), Chirayu Patel
ndproxy-00 (General comments), Chirayu Patel
RE: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney
RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
[no subject], Unknown
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Andrew White

Sep 30 2003

Re: help, Mark . Andrews
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Fred Templin
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Fred Templin
Response to appeal by Tony Hain on site-local issue, The IESG
help, Abdul-Hafeez Jamali
Agenda Requests for Minneapolis, Brian Haberman
Re: Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Ralph Droms
Comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt, Brian Haberman
Test Mesg. Pls Ignore, Robert Honore
Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Brian Haberman
Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Thomas Narten
RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
RE: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney

Sep 29 2003

Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Thomas Narten
Re: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, Brian Haberman
Re: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, Thomas Narten
RE: Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, john . loughney
Re: Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, Thomas Narten
Re: Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, Thomas Narten
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Måns Nilsson
Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Steven Blake
Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Brian E Carpenter
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py

Sep 28 2003

Re: why market picked up NATs, Antonio Querubin
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Måns Nilsson
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Måns Nilsson
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: why market picked up NATs, Lutz Pressler
Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Sep 26 2003

RE: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Soohong Daniel Park
IPv6 to IPv4 translator, Ron Lee

Sep 26 2003

Re: why market picked up NATs, Antonio Querubin
Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Zefram
Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Fred Templin
Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, James Kempf
Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Steven Blake
Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
RE: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Soliman Hesham
Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Pekka Savola

Sep 25 2003

[I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Bob Hinden
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Bob Hinden
Re: Prefix Delegation and Cascading [was why market picked up NATs], Pekka Savola
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py

Sep 24 2003

Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Bob Hinden
Prefix Delegation and Cascading [was why market picked up NATs], Bob Hinden
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Fred Templin
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Jari Arkko
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Erik Nordmark
Fwd: Last Call: 'Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6' to Proposed Standard, Bob Hinden
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, john . loughney
Re: why market picked up NATs, Andrew White
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Updating the Node Requirements document, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue25: 6.1 Transition Mechanisms, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue24: 5.3 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) - RFC3315, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, john . loughney
Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, john . loughney
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Thomas Narten
Issue21: Section 4.2: Prefix discovery & DAD, john . loughney
Issue20: Sect. 4.2 disabling Router Discovery, john . loughney
Issue 19: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, john . loughney
Re: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Brian Haberman
RE: Node requirement nits (was: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt), john . loughney
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Tim Chown
RE: Mobility text in node reqts (Was: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt), john . loughney
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Brian E Carpenter
Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Pekka Nikander
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
RE: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Michel Py
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Pekka Savola
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ralph Droms
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ralph Droms
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Benny Amorsen

Sep 23 2003

Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Margaret Wasserman
Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michael Thomas
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
Re: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Note on id/loc separation discussion, Brian Haberman
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian de Larrinaga
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Pekka Savola
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Amoakoh Gyasi-Agyei
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ron Lee
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
[no subject], Unknown
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michael Thomas
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Erik Nordmark

Sep 22 2003

Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Brian E Carpenter
Re: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter

Sep 20 2003

Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Sep 20 2003

RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore

Sep 19 2003

Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
Renewed HIP mailing list & BOF and WG proposals, Pekka Nikander
Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Geoff Huston
RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Dave Crocker
OT: Argh, mea culpa ;_; (was Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?)), Eugene M. Kim
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Eugene M. Kim
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Eugene M. Kim

Sep 18 2003

RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, BAUDOT Alain FTRD/DMI/CAE
Re: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, BAUDOT Alain FTRD/DMI/CAE
why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Pekka Savola
Scope_Id, C i j u O. B a b y
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locatoridentifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore

Sep 17 2003

Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Dave Crocker
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re: A strawman analysis...), Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re: A strawman analysis...), Bound, Jim
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re:A strawman analysis...), Pekka Nikander
comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Pekka Savola
Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Dave Crocker
RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
RE: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Michel Py

Sep 16 2003

Re: Results of Poll, Hans Kruse
RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Erik Nordmark
Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Erik Nordmark
Results of Poll, Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Keith Moore
What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Pekka Nikander
RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
RE: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Michel Py
RE: About identifiers, HITs, and security (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Michel Py
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Erik Nordmark

Sep 15 2003

Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, James Kempf
Request to Advance "MIB for the Internet Protocol (IP)", Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems...), Jari Arkko
Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems...), Randall R. Stewart (home)
Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Pekka Nikander
RE: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), marcelo bagnulo
RE: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Robson Oliveira
Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Tim Chown
Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Pekka Savola
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locatoridentifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore
Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers(was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Pekka Nikander
Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Iljitsch van Beijnum
A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers(was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Pekka Nikander
About identifiers, HITs, and security (was Re: A roadmap for end-pointidentifiers?), Pekka Nikander
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, EricLKlein
Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Chirayu Patel
Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Mark Smith
Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Tim Chown
Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Pekka Savola
Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Bhaskar S

Sep 13 2003

Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein

Sep 13 2003

(no subject), B.Svante Eriksson
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Eugene M. Kim

Sep 12 2003

Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Test - please ignore, Suresh Krishnan (QB/EMC)
Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Stephen Sprunk
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
New IPv6 co-chair, Thomas Narten
Re: About DHTs, byzantine robustness, and security (was Re: A roadmapfor end-point identifiers? ...), Pekka Nikander
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Zefram
Commercial IDS?, Christian Hoheisel
New list (ipv6 at ietf.org) Active, Bob Hinden
Re: IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel, Christian Hoheisel
RE: test, Michel Py
test, Bob Hinden
set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel, xuke
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
Re: (no subject), Tim Osburn
(no subject), FIGEN CETIN

Mail converted by MHonArc