IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Oct 03 2008

Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Alexandru Petrescu
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Pekka Savola
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Brian E Carpenter

Oct 02 2008

RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
FW: IPv6 Subnet Model, Hemant Singh (shemant)
RE: Neighbor Discovery from non-neighbors, Hemant Singh (shemant)
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Pekka Savola
Re: [v4v6interim] v4v6interim at ietf.org Mailing list, Nathan Ward
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
Re: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier?, Jeroen Massar
Re: Neighbor Discovery from non-neighbors, Pekka Savola
Re: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier?, Mark Andrews
Re: Neighbor Discovery from non-neighbors, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Neighbor Discovery from non-neighbors, Pekka Savola
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Christopher Morrow
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.

Oct 01 2008

Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Francis Dupont
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, slblake

Mail converted by MHonArc